“…In order to obtain a full picture of ontogenetic fish movements, a toolbox approach is required, where a range of independent techniques providing information at specific spatial and temporal scales can be used to understand connectivity across life‐history stages (Begg & Waldman, 1999; Fromentin et al , 2009; Kaplan et al , 2010). A number of natural tags are employed for this purpose, including stable isotopes in soft tissues (Rodgers & Wing, 2008), amino‐acid signatures (Riveiro et al , 2011), molecular genetics (Cook et al , 2007), parasite loadings (Sequeira et al , 2010), phenotypic markers such as morphometrics (Lawton et al , 2010), colour (Arnegard et al , 1999) and otolith shape (Ferguson et al , 2011), as well as the chemical composition of calcified structures such as otoliths and scales (Campana, 1999). Each method has shown potential for determining population structure and discriminating among resident and migrant fishes, however, otolith chemistry has shown the greatest promise for reconstructing lifetime movements.…”