2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2021.106094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Otolith shape analysis of the Brazilian silverside in two northeastern Brazilian estuaries with distinct salinity ranges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These effects potentially cascade to several otolith features due to the variable formation of fish otoliths. It was also observed that fish exposed to more saline waters have longer [74], heavier otoliths with higher isotopic carbon and oxygen concentrations [75], and greater and wider otolith growth and increment depositions [76,77]. These may be attributed to the D. kurroides in the Sibuyan Sea having longer (more elliptic), larger, and heavier otoliths.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…These effects potentially cascade to several otolith features due to the variable formation of fish otoliths. It was also observed that fish exposed to more saline waters have longer [74], heavier otoliths with higher isotopic carbon and oxygen concentrations [75], and greater and wider otolith growth and increment depositions [76,77]. These may be attributed to the D. kurroides in the Sibuyan Sea having longer (more elliptic), larger, and heavier otoliths.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, it is now realized that it does not necessarily reflect genetic differences (e.g., Stransky, 2005; Vignon & Morat, 2010). Several studies suggest that while genetics constrain the overall shape of the otolith itself, environmental conditions such as food availability, depth, water temperature, salinity, substrate type, and exposure to environmental contaminants alter the rates of somatic and otolith growth, which in turn may affect otolith outline (e.g., Cardinale et al, 2004; Clark et al, 2021; Di Franco et al, 2019; Gagliano & McCormick, 2004; Hong et al, 2021; Lombarte & Lleonart, 1993; Oozeki & Watanabe, 2000; Schulz‐Mirbach et al, 2008; Vignon, 2018). The other qualitative characters, including coloration that has high intraspecific variability in these species (Figure 12), cannot distinguish between P. iranicus and P. patimari . PCA and DFA plots for the meristic and morphometric data, however, showed a clear separation of the two main subclades corresponding to P. iranicus and P. patimari (Hg1 + Hg2 + Hg3), suggesting the presence of significant morphological variation meriting formal taxonomic recognition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is now realized that it does not necessarily reflect genetic differences (e.g., Stransky, 2005;Vignon & Morat, 2010). Several studies suggest that while genetics constrain the overall shape of the otolith itself, environmental conditions such as food availability, depth, water temperature, salinity, substrate type, and exposure to environmental contaminants alter the rates of somatic and otolith growth, which in turn may affect otolith outline (e.g., Cardinale et al, 2004;Clark et al, 2021;Di Franco et al, 2019;Gagliano & McCormick, 2004;Hong et al, 2021;Lombarte & Lleonart, 1993;Oozeki & Watanabe, 2000;Schulz-Mirbach et al, 2008;Vignon, 2018).…”
Section: Species Diversity and Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vitro experiments are generally required, together with studies on otolith morphology. Furthermore, the comparison of the otoliths of different species and their populations are essential for improving our knowledge of these differences and our ability to detect them [1,47,57,65,66].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%