Otolith Biometry-Body Length Relationships in Four Fish Species (Chub, Pikeperch, Crucian carp, and Common Carp)

Bostancı, Derya

doi:10.1080/02705060.2009.9664339

Cited by 22 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 6 publications

(1 reference statement)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The linear regression model was preferred for the examination of the relationship between fish length and otolith characteristics in most of the studies (Basusta et al 2013;Battaglia et al 2010;Harvey et al 2000;Waessle et al 2003;Zorica et al 2010), as such also in this study. According to this study, the otolith length was found as (Aydin et al 2004;Basusta et al 2013;Bostancı 2009;Harvey et al 2000;Hossucu et al 1999;Waessle et al 2003).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 86%

Otolith Shape Analyses and Dimensions of the Anchovy Engraulis encrasicolus L. in the Black and Marmara Seas

Zengin¹,

Saygın²,

Polat³

2015

JSM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 86%

Otolith Shape Analyses and Dimensions of the Anchovy Engraulis encrasicolus L. in the Black and Marmara Seas

Zengin¹,

Saygın²,

Polat³

2015

JSM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…measurement of process, and a technique often used. There are numerous studies on the subject (Cardinale et al, 2000;Pino et al, 2004;Gümüs et al, 2007;Bostanci, 2009;Bostanci & Polat, 2011;Keskin, 2013). However, the linear correlation between total length and otolith length can be stronger than the relationship between total length and otolith weight.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Morphological and Biometrical Characteristics on Otolith of Barbus tauricus Kessler, 1877 on Light and Scanning Electron Microscope

Kontaş

Bostancı

2015

Int. J. Morphol.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SUMMARY:The otolith morphology, biometry and the relationship between the otolith size and fish length were examined. The weight, length, width, area and perimeter were recorded for each pair of otoliths. The values of form factor (FF), roundness (RD), aspect ratio (AR), circularity (C), rectangularity (R) and elipticity (E) were calculated and the relationships between otolith length (OL) and shape indices were showed with graphics. According to paired t-test results, difference between right and left otoliths was important statistically (P<0.05), except otolith length. It is the first time, the difference of otolith variables were observed not only right and left pairs but also females and males of fish a member of Cyprinidae. While the otolith weight had the lowest coefficient of determination (r 2 ) such as 0.69; 0.59; 0.65, otolith length had the highest 0.80; 0.81; 0.80, for female, male and all specimens, respectively. In addition, SEM images were firstly shown for otoliths of B. tauricus to determine the otolith morphology.

show abstract

“…The estimated relationship between fish length and otolith biometry can be also used to determine fish length during development based on otolith morphometry. The otoliths can remain undigested for long periods in carnivore fish stomach and is possible to estimate prey fish size based on otoliths found in the stomach (Bostanci, 2009).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Relationships between fish and otolith dimensions of Epinephelus summana (Forsskål, 1775) and Cephalopholis argus (Schneider, 1801) from the Egyptian Red Sea coast

Mehanna¹,

Osman²,

Hassan³

et al. 2019

Egypt. J. of Aquatic Biolo. and Fish.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Egyptian Red Sea Otolith morphology analysis is one of the main tools used for fish or stock identification. Moreover, it is used in the stomach content studies for the identification of prey fish and their size according to the relationship between fish and otolith sizes. In the present study, the relationships between fish length and otolith morphological dimensions were investigated for Epinephelus summana (Forsskål, 1775) and Cephalopholis argus (Schneider, 1801) (family: Serranidae). A total of 170 E. summana and 154 E. argus (i.e 340 and 308 sagittal otoliths for E. summana and E. argus respectively) were sampled from the coast of the Egyptian Red Sea off Shalateen fishing ground. The statistical analysis was done by generalized linear models for the relationship between body length and weight and otolith morphology descriptors (length, width, area and perimeter) and shape indices (Aspect ratio, Compactness, rectangularity, Sulcus and Ostium). The results revealed that there is significantly correlation between the TL of fish and the eleven morphology descriptors and shape indices, where the side effect was p<0.05. Also, this study added new information for the region because of lack of data for the relationships between otolith morphometric and fish length.

show abstract

Otolith Biometry-Body Length Relationships in Four Fish Species (Chub, Pikeperch, Crucian carp, and Common Carp)

Cited by 22 publications

References 6 publications

Otolith Shape Analyses and Dimensions of the Anchovy Engraulis encrasicolus L. in the Black and Marmara Seas

Otolith Shape Analyses and Dimensions of the Anchovy Engraulis encrasicolus L. in the Black and Marmara Seas

Morphological and Biometrical Characteristics on Otolith of Barbus tauricus Kessler, 1877 on Light and Scanning Electron Microscope

Relationships between fish and otolith dimensions of Epinephelus summana (Forsskål, 1775) and Cephalopholis argus (Schneider, 1801) from the Egyptian Red Sea coast

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About