2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2005.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Otitis media, the quality of child care, and the social/communicative behavior of toddlers: A replication and extension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there is a professional debate on the effect that otitis media may have on language development and on what constitutes an optimal intervention [21,22], hearing screening process was valuable in helping to identify children with compromised hearing health who needed further monitoring or treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is a professional debate on the effect that otitis media may have on language development and on what constitutes an optimal intervention [21,22], hearing screening process was valuable in helping to identify children with compromised hearing health who needed further monitoring or treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is professional debate on the effect that otitis media may have on language development and on what constitutes optimal intervention [26,27], the OAE hearing screening process was valuable in helping to identify children with compromised hearing health who needed further monitoring or treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is lively professional debate on the effect that otitis media may have on language development and on what constitutes optimal intervention (Roberts et al, 2004;Vernon-Feagans & Manlove, 2005), the OAE hearing screening process was valuable in helping health care providers identify children with compromised hearing-health who needed further monitoring or treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%