2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2017.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Other-regarding preferences, in-group bias and political participation: An experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The degree to which a person identifies as a member of a particular group influences various modes of political participation (e.g., Robalo, Schram, & Sonnemans, 2017). Studies explain this increased likelihood to participate in political actions due to a sense of shared experience with other ingroup members and a shared fate with them (Van Stekelenburg & Klandermans, 2013), which can be understood as part of the group self-definition dimension.…”
Section: Ingroup Identification Political Participation and Social Me...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degree to which a person identifies as a member of a particular group influences various modes of political participation (e.g., Robalo, Schram, & Sonnemans, 2017). Studies explain this increased likelihood to participate in political actions due to a sense of shared experience with other ingroup members and a shared fate with them (Van Stekelenburg & Klandermans, 2013), which can be understood as part of the group self-definition dimension.…”
Section: Ingroup Identification Political Participation and Social Me...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They find that stronger communication-more words, more content-has a positive effect on the ingroup and a negative effect on the outgroup. Robalo et al (2017) also induce ingroup bias in an experiment related to political issues without using communication. They group people according to the results of a personality questionnaire and find that political participation is higher when ingroup bias is stronger.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“… 7. For an alternative, albeit related, formalization of group bias and other-regarding preferences in a unified framework, see Robalo et al (2017). For a review of general altruism models, see Rotemberg (2014). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%