1995
DOI: 10.1109/68.372764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OTDR performance enhancement using a quaternary FSK modulated probe and coherent detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Afterwards, we can simultaneously detect and process multiple IF signals generated in the coherent detection process between the Rayleigh signals of the multi-frequency probe backscattered in the fiber under test (FUT) and the original single-frequency LO. This process speeds up measurement efficiency, compared with conventional singlefrequency probe based C-OTDR [4,5] . The schematic diagram of the multi-frequency probe (MFP) based C-OTDR is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Coherent Optical Time Domain Reflectometry (C-otdr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Afterwards, we can simultaneously detect and process multiple IF signals generated in the coherent detection process between the Rayleigh signals of the multi-frequency probe backscattered in the fiber under test (FUT) and the original single-frequency LO. This process speeds up measurement efficiency, compared with conventional singlefrequency probe based C-OTDR [4,5] . The schematic diagram of the multi-frequency probe (MFP) based C-OTDR is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Coherent Optical Time Domain Reflectometry (C-otdr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, compared with the conventional single-frequency probe based C-OTDR, according to the experimental results shown in Fig. 7, SBS threshold improvement by PM in the MFP C-OTDR cannot enhance the maximum dynamic range; in addition, the dynamic range is improved mainly by enhancing measurement efficiency [4,5] . In conclusion, the non linear effects that limit the performance of the MFP C-OTDR are investigated and discussed.…”
Section: Coherent Optical Time Domain Reflectometry (C-otdr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are three main methods that can fill this goal: the first is to increase the probe pulse power to correspondingly improve the backscattered signal power, then the second is to use high performance photo detector with low noise level, and the third is to increase measurement and average times to reduce noise level, which is essential in OTDR system for it contributes a 27dB DR enhancement by measurement of 2 18 times [4]. Therefore, it is a potential way to fast increase measurement times even if the hardware of the OTDR system such as laser and photo detector is perfect [8].However, conventional OTDR only sends one probe pulse in a pulse period which is usually a little larger than the round-trip time of the probe pulse propagating in fibre under test (FUT), so, to increase measurement number means to extend measurement time and thus most of the time in the fixed pulse period is wasted. To solve this problem, multiplexing methods, which are widely used in communication technology to increase the data transmission capacity, are employed to enhance the measurement efficiency of OTDR system [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The first relies on the use of pilot signals, which are known signals inserted to travel along the same paths as data signals but are distinguishable from data signals. As an alternative, we can use an optical time domain reflectrometer (OTDR) to detect the echo of pilot signals at the transmitter [9]. The second approach is based on observing the statistical parameters such as optical signal average power, optical signal frequency spectrum, and the BER of a lightpath [10]- [12].…”
Section: Existing Supervisory Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can extend the result from theorem 1 to the case with , problem (5) becomes minimize subject to (9) The Lagrange multiplier method gives the same condition as in (7), namely , . We have from Lemma 1 that under Assumption 1 there exists at most one positive solution to in .…”
Section: A Worst-case Scenario For Andmentioning
confidence: 99%