1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0029(19960201)33:2<141::aid-jemt5>3.0.co;2-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Osteopontin at mineralized tissue interfaces in bone, teeth, and osseointegrated implants: Ultrastructural distribution and implications for mineralized tissue formation, turnover, and repair

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
193
0
8

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 329 publications
(206 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
5
193
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on studies on bone remodeling, several authors reported that a variety of mononuclear cell types, e.g., mononuclear phagocytes or macrophage-like cells (Tran Van et al, 1982), preosteoblasts (McKee andNanci, 1996a), bone-lining cells (Everts et al, 2002), and partially released osteocytes (Tran Van et al, 1982;Oguro and Ozawa, 1989) were observed along the resorbed bone surface during the reversal period. Thus, some authors considered that these mononuclear cells might scavenge the bone surface at the end of osteoclastic resorption (Heersche, 1978; Tran Van et al, 1982;Everts et al, 2002) and that the cement line/reversal line seen on the resorbed surface might be formed by these mononuclear cells (Heersche, 1978; Tran Van et al, 1982;McKee and Nanci, 1996a;Everts et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Based on studies on bone remodeling, several authors reported that a variety of mononuclear cell types, e.g., mononuclear phagocytes or macrophage-like cells (Tran Van et al, 1982), preosteoblasts (McKee andNanci, 1996a), bone-lining cells (Everts et al, 2002), and partially released osteocytes (Tran Van et al, 1982;Oguro and Ozawa, 1989) were observed along the resorbed bone surface during the reversal period. Thus, some authors considered that these mononuclear cells might scavenge the bone surface at the end of osteoclastic resorption (Heersche, 1978; Tran Van et al, 1982;Everts et al, 2002) and that the cement line/reversal line seen on the resorbed surface might be formed by these mononuclear cells (Heersche, 1978; Tran Van et al, 1982;McKee and Nanci, 1996a;Everts et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, some authors considered that these mononuclear cells might scavenge the bone surface at the end of osteoclastic resorption (Heersche, 1978; Tran Van et al, 1982;Everts et al, 2002) and that the cement line/reversal line seen on the resorbed surface might be formed by these mononuclear cells (Heersche, 1978; Tran Van et al, 1982;McKee and Nanci, 1996a;Everts et al, 2002). In the case of tooth resorption, it was also reported that similar kinds of mononuclear cell types, e.g., cementoblast-like cells (Sasaki et al, 1990), machrophage-like cells or fibroblast-like cells (Tanaka et al, 1990;Okamura et al, 1993), and a special class of mononuclear cells (Bosshardt and Schroeder, 1998) were seen lining the resorption surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(26) In bone, OPN is found throughout the bulk mineralized extracellular matrix, where it binds to the inorganic mineral phase of bone (apatite crystals). (30) It is also concentrated at cell-matrix and matrix-matrix/mineral interfaces such as at the lamina limitans at the interface between osteocytes and bone-lining cells (and their cell processes within canaliculi) and bone, at the cement line interface between older and newer bone whose juxtaposition occurs as part of bone remodeling, (31) and where bone mineralization is initiated. In binding to the apatitic mineral crystals in bone, available data all indicate that OPN is a potent inhibitor of mineralization, where it is thought to guide crystal growth, shape, size, and alignment in a carefully regulated manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%