2016
DOI: 10.5397/cise.2016.19.4.252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Osteomyelitis Resulting from Chronic Septic Olecranon Bursitis: Report of Two Cases

Abstract: We reported the two cases of olecranon osteomyelitis secondary to the iatrogenic chronic relapsing septic olecranon bursitis. Infection was well eradicated by excision of the infected bursa and curettage of the eroded olecranon under the coverage of antibiotic therapy. (Clin Shoulder Elbow 2016;19(4):252-255)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, given that our patient was a manual laborer who was concerned about returning to work quickly and the possibility of further surgery for muscle flap coverage of the debrided bone [ 74 , 75 ], we opted to avoid debridement of the olecranon. After our patient successfully cleared his infection, it became clear to us that there have been reports of septic olecranon bursitis with osteomyelitis that utilized bone debridement without subsequent plastic surgery intervention for wound coverage (e.g., no muscle flap was required) [ 76 , 77 ]. Therefore, physicians who are faced with similar circumstances should consider more aggressive debridement than what was done in this present case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, given that our patient was a manual laborer who was concerned about returning to work quickly and the possibility of further surgery for muscle flap coverage of the debrided bone [ 74 , 75 ], we opted to avoid debridement of the olecranon. After our patient successfully cleared his infection, it became clear to us that there have been reports of septic olecranon bursitis with osteomyelitis that utilized bone debridement without subsequent plastic surgery intervention for wound coverage (e.g., no muscle flap was required) [ 76 , 77 ]. Therefore, physicians who are faced with similar circumstances should consider more aggressive debridement than what was done in this present case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%