2019
DOI: 10.26028/cybium/2019-423-007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Osteometry and size reconstruction of the Indian and Pacific Oceans’ Euthynnus species, E. affinis and E. lineatus (Scombridae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is acknowledged that using such few reference specimens (compared to usually around 20-70 individuals in other species; Jelu et al, 2021;Marrast & Béarez, 2019;Thieren et al, 2012) may underestimate error in the current study. It is possible that the full extent of intraspecific variation might not have been observed and, therefore, caution should be taken in that the prediction error observed herein should be interpreted as an absolute minimum upon which further studies with greater sample sizes should elaborate on.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It is acknowledged that using such few reference specimens (compared to usually around 20-70 individuals in other species; Jelu et al, 2021;Marrast & Béarez, 2019;Thieren et al, 2012) may underestimate error in the current study. It is possible that the full extent of intraspecific variation might not have been observed and, therefore, caution should be taken in that the prediction error observed herein should be interpreted as an absolute minimum upon which further studies with greater sample sizes should elaborate on.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Some studies (e.g., Desse & Desse-Berset, 1996;Jelu et al, 2021;Lidour et al, 2018) have only reported R 2 values, to which our R 2 values of >0.97 and >0.98 compare favorably. Others (Gabriel et al, 2012;Marrast & Béarez, 2019;Martínez-Polanco & Béarez, 2020;Rurua et al, 2020;Thieren et al, 2012) report standard error of estimate (SEE) values without defining how they are calculated, which limits comparisons with our RSE values. In any case, R 2 and standard error values are prone to be skewed if sampling is uneven across a given size range and if error is not normally distributed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations