2018
DOI: 10.15690/pf.v15i3.1902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Osteogenesis Imperfecta: Diagnostic Feature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The classification of the disease, taking into account the molecular pathogenesis of the disease, complicated the work of clinical doctors and in 2016 the International committee of nomenclature of constitutional disorders of the skele ton, INCDS) reduced the classification to 5 forms, retaining 4 types, which were originally described by silence and adding a 5th type. In total, 5 groups of the disease were identified using the Arabic digital system, which indicates the unifying phenotypic characteristics, and individual (characteristic for a particular type) changes still retained their original Roman designation (Table 2) (Ignatovich et al, 2018). This characteristic leaves room for the inclusion of new genes found as the cause of osteogenesis imperfecta until the degree of heterogeneity of the disease is identified.…”
Section: Evolution Of Classification Criteria Of Osteogenesis Imperfectamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The classification of the disease, taking into account the molecular pathogenesis of the disease, complicated the work of clinical doctors and in 2016 the International committee of nomenclature of constitutional disorders of the skele ton, INCDS) reduced the classification to 5 forms, retaining 4 types, which were originally described by silence and adding a 5th type. In total, 5 groups of the disease were identified using the Arabic digital system, which indicates the unifying phenotypic characteristics, and individual (characteristic for a particular type) changes still retained their original Roman designation (Table 2) (Ignatovich et al, 2018). This characteristic leaves room for the inclusion of new genes found as the cause of osteogenesis imperfecta until the degree of heterogeneity of the disease is identified.…”
Section: Evolution Of Classification Criteria Of Osteogenesis Imperfectamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, 20 genes responsible for the development of OI have been identified. The autosomal dominant type of ND inheritance in most cases is caused by defects in the COLIA1 or COLIA2 genes of type I collagen chains encoding α1 (I) and α2 (I) peptide type I collagen chains, respectively (Ignatovich et al, 2018). Autosomal dominant disease inheritance options have also been described in several patients with mutations in the IFITM5 (MIM: 614757) and P4HB (MIM: 176790) genes.…”
Section: Modern Views On the Etiology And Pathogenesis Of Osteogenesimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been demonstrated that there is a 25% risk that a child whose parent suffers from bronchial asthma also develop this disease. If both parents have asthma, the risk increases to 50% [ 4 ]. Furthermore, it has been proved that there exists an association between the increasing incidence rate of BA and aggravated soil, air, and water contamination [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been demonstrated that a decrease in TNSALP activity and the concentration of its substrates correlate with the severity of the clinical symptoms of HPP, defining a heterogeneous phenotype of the disease [ 8 ]. However, the activity of TNSALP can decrease under the influence of drugs, the lack of zinc, magnesium (in celiac disease), achondroplasia, and anemia and lead to an increase in liver diseases and osteogenesis imperfecta [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%