2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Osteogenesis by foamed and 3D-printed nanostructured calcium phosphate scaffolds: Effect of pore architecture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
82
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…104 Pore structure is another important aspect of bone scaffolds. 7 The advantages of pores have been described in the numerous studies; they allow for osteoblasts migration and proliferation, the transport of nutrients and waste, 7,107,108 and vascularization. 109 Hence, well-interconnected pore structures could facilitate cell infiltration and the transportion of nutrient and nutritions and waste.…”
Section: From the Microscale Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…104 Pore structure is another important aspect of bone scaffolds. 7 The advantages of pores have been described in the numerous studies; they allow for osteoblasts migration and proliferation, the transport of nutrients and waste, 7,107,108 and vascularization. 109 Hence, well-interconnected pore structures could facilitate cell infiltration and the transportion of nutrient and nutritions and waste.…”
Section: From the Microscale Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to ionic dopants, other parameters related to HAp particles and their 3D-printed scaffolds could be effective in directing cell fate (Ribeiro et al, 2010;Costa-Rodrigues et al, 2012;Li Q. et al, 2019) including pore architecture and surface topography of the scaffolds (orientation and roughness) (Roh et al, 2016(Roh et al, , 2017Barba et al, 2018). For example, it has been reported that the use of nanosized HAp particles in 3D-printed bone composite scaffolds (PCL/nanosized HAp particle) results in an enhanced adhesion, viability, and osteogenic differentiation of hMSCs when compared with the counterparts containing microsized HAp particles (Domingos et al, 2017).…”
Section: Potential and Significance In Hard Tissue Regeneration And Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies on CDHA and nano‐HA, the main components of the PCaP scaffolds tested in this study, have convincingly shown their osteoconductive capacity. [ 14 ] Also, our work shows an osteoconductive component of the regenerative process, as neo‐bone is progressing through the scaffold from the host tissue, and integrates tightly with the ceramic remnants, but our analysis at a single time point provides no clear evidence for intrinsic osteoinduction. In other studies, osteoinductive properties in the absence of exogenously added growth factors have already been demonstrated, first for nano‐HA, [ 27 ] but also for CDHA, depending on the nanostructure of the biomimetic apatite particles resulting from the hardening process of the cement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%