2002
DOI: 10.1006/excr.2002.5612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Osteoclasts from Mice Deficient in Tartrate-Resistant Acid Phosphatase Have Altered Ruffled Borders and Disturbed Intracellular Vesicular Transport

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
52
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
4
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our RT-PCR and Western blot analysis on bone extracts and immunohistochemistry on bone tissue sections clearly indicated a higher expression of cathepsin K versus L in trabecular osteoclasts and, moreover, indicated that the majority of cathepsin K protein was processed to the active form and co-localized with TRAP in osteoclasts, whereas the majority of cathepsin L was present as the inactive precursor form and did not co-localize to a significant extent with TRAP in osteoclasts. Osteoclasts secrete TRAP (12,74,75) as well as cathepsin K (32,76) into the resorption lacuna. In order to define the potential sites of cathepsin Kmediated processing of TRAP, we assessed the subcellular distribution of cathepsin K and the monomeric and proteolytically processed TRAP by ultrastructural immunocytochemistry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our RT-PCR and Western blot analysis on bone extracts and immunohistochemistry on bone tissue sections clearly indicated a higher expression of cathepsin K versus L in trabecular osteoclasts and, moreover, indicated that the majority of cathepsin K protein was processed to the active form and co-localized with TRAP in osteoclasts, whereas the majority of cathepsin L was present as the inactive precursor form and did not co-localize to a significant extent with TRAP in osteoclasts. Osteoclasts secrete TRAP (12,74,75) as well as cathepsin K (32,76) into the resorption lacuna. In order to define the potential sites of cathepsin Kmediated processing of TRAP, we assessed the subcellular distribution of cathepsin K and the monomeric and proteolytically processed TRAP by ultrastructural immunocytochemistry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After extraction, the RNA was treated with 5 units of DNase I (Invitrogen) for 30 min at room temperature. The reverse transcriptase reaction was performed with 5 g of total RNA and 200 units of Superscript TM II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) at 42°C, using (dT) [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] as primer (Invitrogen), according to the protocol of the manufacturer. In negative controls, reverse transcriptase was excluded from the reaction mixture.…”
Section: Relative Quantification Of Cathepsin K and L Mrnamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Femoral bones from WT and TRAP+p mice were prepared for immunohistochemistry as described previously [Hollberg et al, 2002]. In order to detect cathepsin K, total TRAP (i.e.…”
Section: Immunohistochemistry For Light Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%