2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.diamond.2005.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Osteoblasts attachment on amorphous carbon films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Owing to their wide range of properties [9], amorphous carbon surfaces have received a special attention particularly focused on their biocompatibility/ haemocompatibility when used as biomedical implant coatings [10][11][12][13][14][15] or on their interactions with molecular additives in the case of hard disk or solid lubricant coatings [16,17]. Amorphous carbon has also been used as anti-stiction coating in MEMS [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to their wide range of properties [9], amorphous carbon surfaces have received a special attention particularly focused on their biocompatibility/ haemocompatibility when used as biomedical implant coatings [10][11][12][13][14][15] or on their interactions with molecular additives in the case of hard disk or solid lubricant coatings [16,17]. Amorphous carbon has also been used as anti-stiction coating in MEMS [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous in-vitro and in-vivo experiments have indicated that DLC can have both excellent biocompatibility and hemocompatibility [2][3][4][5]. In the past, the wettability of DLC coatings has been modified by selective doping using both metal and non-metal dopants [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in this study the mechanical properties of the modified films were not analyzed. In a different study [5], substrates with various substrate roughness were employed to investigate the attachment of human osteoblast cells to amorphous carbon films with different surface textures. This study concluded that cell attachment increased monotonically with surface roughness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to surface chemistry, the attachment of osteoblasts is also affected by surface topography (21,2427). Although a variety of studies (21,25,2730) have revealed few consistent trends in the effects of surface topography on initial osteoblastic attachment, the most commonly observed trend has been that a porous structure is beneficial to cell attachment (15,17, 21,25,28,29). When the Mn-TiO 2 coating is placed into the culture medium, the porous nanostructured surface facilitates the adsorption of proteins from the culture medium, by providing a larger contact area at the sample-medium interface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%