1997
DOI: 10.1016/s1092-9134(97)80011-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ossifying fibromyxoid tumor of soft parts: A report of 17 cases with emphasis on unusual histological features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence exists for a schwannian or neuronal differentiation but this has not been well proven. [18][19][20] Similarly, cartilaginous or myoepithelial differentiation was proposed by Enzinger et al 2 and Kilpatrick et al, 15 respectively. From these hypotheses, Graham et al 7 suggested a ''scrambled'' phenotype for these tumors.…”
Section: Differential Diagnosesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Evidence exists for a schwannian or neuronal differentiation but this has not been well proven. [18][19][20] Similarly, cartilaginous or myoepithelial differentiation was proposed by Enzinger et al 2 and Kilpatrick et al, 15 respectively. From these hypotheses, Graham et al 7 suggested a ''scrambled'' phenotype for these tumors.…”
Section: Differential Diagnosesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Enzinger et al, in their original description, noted OFMT to have ultrastructural features suggestive of incomplete schwannian and/or cartilaginous differentiation (10). Subsequent immunohistochemical studies have also for the most part supported the concept of schwannian differentiation in OFMT (13, 16, 20, 29, 30, 39), although myoepithelial differentiation has also been suggested (18, 22). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In its classical form, OFMT is characterized by subcutaneous location, a peripheral shell of woven bone, and a vaguely lobular proliferation of small, bland round cells with very low mitotic activity, embedded in a fibromyxoid matrix (10). Although most OFMT conform to this morphologic description and show correspondingly benign clinical behavior, it has been recognized for some time that a subset of OFMT display atypical cytoarchitectural features, such as high cellularity or elevated mitotic activity, and show correspondingly more aggressive clinical behavior (13, 18, 39). Under the risk stratification system proposed in 2003 by Folpe and Weiss, OFMT are classified as “typical”, “atypical” or “malignant” based on their size, nuclear grade, cellularity, and mitotic activity (13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Este caso clínico muestra varias cosas, en primer lugar que en la literatura se han reportado aproximadamente 220 casos de TFO, principalmente a través de la comunicación de casos clínicos y algunas series de distintos tamaños [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] , destacando el estudio de Miettinen et al sados, tomando como base la muestra analizada por Enzinger y ampliando el período de análisis a 37 años. El TFO es un tumor de muy baja frecuencia, por lo que es fácil que sea confundido, como en este caso, en que fue interpretado como un cáncer anaplásico de tiroides, lo que previamente ya había sido reportado en la tiroides, pero con una neoplasia folicular 10 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…A pesar de esto, mantiene una característica que le otorga un mayor grado de agresividad que un TFO típico, que es la infiltración de estructuras vecinas, lo que no se explica por la radioterapia, además clínicamente la paciente evolucionó con disfagia progresiva, lo que habla de un tumor localmente agresivo. Se han descrito una serie de variantes atípicas de TFO que poseen un mayor grado de atipia celular y que clínicamente se manifiestan con mayor tendencia a recurrir localmente e incluso dar metástasis [3][4][5][6][7] , como en la serie de Folpe en que 8 pacientes, de un total de 70, tuvieron metástasis a distancia (principalmente pulmón). Así, la recurrencia variaría entre un 18% y un 22% según las distintas series, en plazos que van desde los 6 años hasta los 10 años, lo que concuerda con este caso.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified