2018
DOI: 10.1101/306324
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OSPREY 3.0: Open-Source Protein Redesign for You, with Powerful New Features

Abstract: We present osprey 3.0, a new and greatly improved release of the osprey protein design software. osprey 3.0 features a convenient new Python interface, which greatly improves its ease of use. It is over two orders of magnitude faster than previous versions of osprey when running the same algorithms on the same hardware. Moreover, osprey 3.0 includes several new algorithms, which introduce substantial speedups as well as improved biophysical modeling. It also includes GPU support, which provides an additional s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The computational design of new biomolecular interactions remains a fundamentally unsolved problem in protein design, despite notable advances. In the future, protein design programs such as Osprey 39 and Rosetta 40 may become fingerprint-aware, optimizing the sequence of de novo -designed proteins to display the interaction fingerprints on the molecular surface necessary to perform a functional task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computational design of new biomolecular interactions remains a fundamentally unsolved problem in protein design, despite notable advances. In the future, protein design programs such as Osprey 39 and Rosetta 40 may become fingerprint-aware, optimizing the sequence of de novo -designed proteins to display the interaction fingerprints on the molecular surface necessary to perform a functional task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aggregate values for the ensembles in each state were computed by bounding the energy for each conformation in the ensemble, and combining these energy bounds. For each bound and unbound state, we first computed bounds on the the energy of each conformation in the conformational ensemble defined by that state, as was done in Ref., [2][3][4]42,71,72 Although the K * score exhibits good Spearman's rank correlation with experimental K a values, 3,71 the correlation between K * scores and K a is not yet quantitative. First, most physics-based 9 energy functions are based on small-molecule energetics, which can overestimate van der Waals terms and thereby overestimate internal energy.…”
Section: Entropy Internal Energy and Helmholtz Free Energy Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CSPD algorithms search over a user-specified input model (viz., a structural model, allowed side chain and backbone flexibility, allowed mutations, energy function, etc. 3 ). Because proteins exist as thermodynamic ensembles, 39,46 principled algorithms should exploit statistical thermodynamics of non-covalent binding, and therefore require approximation of the partition function.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fraction of RCs unpruned after pruning by iMinDEE (red) or by PLUG followed by iMinDEE (blue), as a function of the pruning interval used for iMinDEE. iMinDEE pruning was performed using the AMBER/EEF1 energy function 47,48 implemented in OSPREY, 49 which is pairwise and thus admits iMinDEE pruning (PLUG pruning is not dependent on the energy function). The green line shows the pruning power of PLUG alone, which is independent of the pruning interval (this is equivalent to the rightmost blue dot, because with an infinite pruning interval, iMinDEE only prunes the most obvious steric clashes A pairwise LUTE matrix was also computed for each of these systems with a rigid backbone but with continuous sidechain entropy.…”
Section: Plug Enables the Highly Efficient Lute Algorithm To Incorpmentioning
confidence: 99%