2015 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/glocom.2015.7417079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OSPF and BGP State Migration for Resource-Portable IP Router

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, if routers hold a simple IGP such as open shortest path first (OSPF), the IGP status of working router can easily duplicated on the secondary router, by copying the signals including OSPF messages from adjacent routers to the working router and inserting them into the secondary router while blocking the signals from the secondary router to the adjacent routers [78]. Therefore, if copying or protectionswitching points can be flexibly deployed across an optical transport network, the IGP status of working router can be easily duplicated on routers for renovation or temporal use, and service traffic can be migrated to them without service interruption, IP topology change, and additional interfaces on adjacent routers.…”
Section: Deployment and Extension Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, if routers hold a simple IGP such as open shortest path first (OSPF), the IGP status of working router can easily duplicated on the secondary router, by copying the signals including OSPF messages from adjacent routers to the working router and inserting them into the secondary router while blocking the signals from the secondary router to the adjacent routers [78]. Therefore, if copying or protectionswitching points can be flexibly deployed across an optical transport network, the IGP status of working router can be easily duplicated on routers for renovation or temporal use, and service traffic can be migrated to them without service interruption, IP topology change, and additional interfaces on adjacent routers.…”
Section: Deployment and Extension Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%