1972
DOI: 10.1063/1.3253108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Osmotic Coefficients and Mean Activity Coefficients of Uni-univalent Electrolytes in Water at 25°C

Abstract: This paper gives values for the osmotic coefficients and mean activity coefficients of uni-univalent electrolytes in aqueous solutions at 25 °C. The values are expressed on the molality or weight basis. The data available in the literature have been corrected to the presently accepted scales of atomic weights (1969) and temperature (IPST 1968) and, where necessary, to the absolute electrical units of 1969 and the fundamental constants of 1963. The selected values of osmotic coefficients and mean activity coeff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

57
1,020
3
6

Year Published

1986
1986
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,178 publications
(1,086 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
57
1,020
3
6
Order By: Relevance
“…For CH,COONa, the behavior of the three methods is similar to that for HCOONa. The Pitzer method agrees well with the new data, although its parameters were obtained from the old data (Hamer and Wu 1972) that were measured for ionic strength up to only 3.5 m. For CH,COOK, the experimental data are only available at low ionic strengths, and all the three methods perform well. At high ionic strengths, however, the Pitzer method behaves quite differently from the Bromley and K-M methods.…”
Section: Estimation Of Actmty Coefficientssupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For CH,COONa, the behavior of the three methods is similar to that for HCOONa. The Pitzer method agrees well with the new data, although its parameters were obtained from the old data (Hamer and Wu 1972) that were measured for ionic strength up to only 3.5 m. For CH,COOK, the experimental data are only available at low ionic strengths, and all the three methods perform well. At high ionic strengths, however, the Pitzer method behaves quite differently from the Bromley and K-M methods.…”
Section: Estimation Of Actmty Coefficientssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Values of the parameters B and q for the Bromley and K-M methods have been refitted to both b~r o m Kim and Frederick (1988). Hamer and Wu's (1972) and Bonner's experimental data for ionic strength up to 14.7 m. In spite of using new fitting parameters (i.e., B and q ) for the Bromley and K-M methods, there is some disagreement between predicted and measured values of the activity coefficient. The Pitzer method, whose parameters were obtained by fitting Hamer and Wu's (1972) experimental data for ionic strength only up to 3.5 m, starts to depart from the measured activity coefficients at an ionic strength of about 7 m. At high ionic strength the Bromley and K-M methods behave similarly for HCOONa, whereas the Pitzer method predicts a considerably lower value of the activity coefficient.…”
Section: Estimation Of Actmty Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison between µmol m −3 amount of NH ). The measured concentration product K mn in units of ppb 2 was determined using the measured data for 24-h sampling time while the theoretical equilibrium constant K n in units of ppb 2 was calculated according to the method in Stelson and Seinfeld (1982a), when the ambient relative humidity (RH) is less than relative humidity of deliquescence (RHD) at any absolute temperature (T ) recorded in Kelvin (Hammer and Wu, 1972):…”
Section: Temporal Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values are β NaOH =-2.2415168, β KOH =-1.5256335 and the values for the slopes (b 3 +b 4 ) NaOH =0.457198, (b 3 +b 4 ) KOH =0.519862, respectively. The γ ± values of NaOH solutions and KOH solutions were taken from the book by (Robinson & Stokes, 1959/65) and the paper by (Hamer & Wu 1972). The mean activity coefficients for the ionic strength 10 -3 mol/kg in Eq.…”
Section: The Asymptotic Theory -The Use Of Corresponding Approximationsmentioning
confidence: 99%