1968
DOI: 10.1021/j100858a018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Osmotic and activity coefficients for binary mixtures of sodium chloride, sodium sulfate, magnesium sulfate, and magnesium chloride in water at 25.deg.. I. Isopiestic measurements on the four systems with common ions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
71
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is unclear to us why Platford's (1968) parameterization of the Scatchard model (using his isopiestic data for NaCl(aq) + MgCl 2 (aq) mixtures) yields results that are close to the Rard and Miller values for γ NaCl but not those for γ MgCl 2 . Essentially opposite behaviour is observed for the Harned-rule model of Wu et al (1968), which is close to Rard and Miller's (1987) prediction for γ MgCl 2 but not for γ NaCl . Pitzer (1991) has emphasised the importance of solubility data as a means of anchoring isothermal activity and osmotic coefficients to a single well-defined point.…”
Section: (Crosses)mentioning
confidence: 44%
“…It is unclear to us why Platford's (1968) parameterization of the Scatchard model (using his isopiestic data for NaCl(aq) + MgCl 2 (aq) mixtures) yields results that are close to the Rard and Miller values for γ NaCl but not those for γ MgCl 2 . Essentially opposite behaviour is observed for the Harned-rule model of Wu et al (1968), which is close to Rard and Miller's (1987) prediction for γ MgCl 2 but not for γ NaCl . Pitzer (1991) has emphasised the importance of solubility data as a means of anchoring isothermal activity and osmotic coefficients to a single well-defined point.…”
Section: (Crosses)mentioning
confidence: 44%
“…The various approximations used for g n , as a function of the ionic strength, lead to different fitting methods. The methods used in this work have been the usual ones from Scatchard [30,31], Pitzer [4][5][6] and from Lim-HOLL [26,27,[32][33][34]. Below, a summary of this I-dependence is presented:…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…can be written in the form: at the total ionic strengths of the mixtures using the extended ionic interaction model parameters of Table 3, and evaluated the b ij by a least-squares method using our isopiestic results and those of Wu et al [21]. Table 7 summarizes the resulting b ij parameter values.…”
Section: Extended Ion-interaction Model Equations and Calculations Fomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data included in the model parameter evaluations are summarized in Table 5. Plotting symbols: , Rard and Miller [39]; , Rard and Miller [30]; , Platford [13]; , Wu et al [21]; , Gibbard and Gossmann [40]; , Padova and Saad [16]; , Stokes [37]; , Robinson and Stokes [36]; , Kuschel and Seidel [17]; ! ", Miladinović, et al [18]; , this study (Table 1); , Frolov et al [38]; , Saad et al [24]; , Robinson and Bower [19].…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation