2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.quageo.2015.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OSL chronology of a sedimentary sequence from the inner-shelf of the East China Sea and its implication on post-glacial deposition history

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the meantime, a number of OSL dating-based studies have been reported in the YRD (e.g. Gao et al, 2016, 2017, 2019; Nian et al, 2018a, 2018b, 2019; Nian and Zhang, 2018; Sugisaki et al, 2015; Wang et al, 2015; Wang F et al, 2018). It has been found that the OSL signal of YRD quartz was well bleached, especially in the medium-grained quartz (MG, 45–63 μm) (Nian et al, 2018a, 2018b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the meantime, a number of OSL dating-based studies have been reported in the YRD (e.g. Gao et al, 2016, 2017, 2019; Nian et al, 2018a, 2018b, 2019; Nian and Zhang, 2018; Sugisaki et al, 2015; Wang et al, 2015; Wang F et al, 2018). It has been found that the OSL signal of YRD quartz was well bleached, especially in the medium-grained quartz (MG, 45–63 μm) (Nian et al, 2018a, 2018b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those situations may constrain the bleaching degree by the time of deposition and the choice of grain size (Mauz et al 2010). In addition, the calculation of dose rate should seriously consider the uncertainties of the disequilibria in the uranium decay series, cosmic contribution and water content variation (Reimann et al 2011;Long et al 2015;Sugisaki et al 2015;Wang et al 2015). When the dose rate of samples from HG-C section were calculated, the likelihood effects of those factors were not considered (Jia et al 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The OSL dates at the sections of 43.3 m and 57.0 m seem to conflict with the continuous deposits since the LGM. The overestimated ages from these two samples are probably caused by partial bleaching, which frequently occurred in the coastal/ shelf environment (Wang et al, 2015). Thus, it can be concluded that Unit 4 was deposited from after the LGM to the end of the Upper Pleistocene.…”
Section: Quaternary Chronostratigraphic Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 91%