2016
DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(16)30508-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Osimertinib for pretreated EGFR Thr790Met-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (AURA2): a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

42
436
4
7

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 565 publications
(506 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
42
436
4
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, we detected 22% KRAS, 6% NRAS and 3% BRAF mutated samples, with only one patient that showed two concurrent mutations (NRAS p.G13D and KRAS p.Q61H). It is remarkable to note that the mutation distribution in cfDNA of this NSCLC baseline patient series was very similar to that reported on tissues derived DNA by previous studies exploiting a multi-gene assay in NSCLC (18)(19)(20)(21).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, we detected 22% KRAS, 6% NRAS and 3% BRAF mutated samples, with only one patient that showed two concurrent mutations (NRAS p.G13D and KRAS p.Q61H). It is remarkable to note that the mutation distribution in cfDNA of this NSCLC baseline patient series was very similar to that reported on tissues derived DNA by previous studies exploiting a multi-gene assay in NSCLC (18)(19)(20)(21).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…SiRe ® , with a lower limit of detection of 0.01% and a reference range of 568 clinical relevant mutations, showed a higher analytical performance respect to a very sensitive modified TaqMan probe real time PCR based approach (13). In the clinical trials settings and in other published validation studies (18)(19)(20), the analysis of cfDNA gene mutations was carried out using as gold standard the mutational status obtained on matched tissue derived DNA, but little is known regarding the application of this approach in clinical setting, in particular in baseline setting of NSCLC patients, prior to EGFR TKIs administration, without a referent DNA derived tissue to confirm the mutational data obtained on cfDNA (21).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These results were confirmed in the Phase II AURA extension, in patients with EGFR TKI-pretreated EGFR T790M-positive disease, where the response rate was reported as 62% and median PFS was 12.3 months [7]. Similarly, in the AURA2 study in patients who had progression on previous EGFR TKI therapy, the response rate was 70% [37]. Pooled OS analysis from AURA2 and the AURA extension showed median OS of 26.8 months from initiation of osimertinib in patients with T790M-positive NSCLC that had progressed after a first-or second-line EGFR TKI [38].…”
Section: Third-generation Egfr Tkis In Patients With Acquired Resistancementioning
confidence: 57%
“…As a mutantselective, covalent inhibitor of the acquired EGFR T790M resistance mutation, osimertinib is currently an approved second-line therapy for EGFR patients who develop resistance to first-line EGFR TKIs mediated by the T790M mutation. Previously reported cohorts from the AURA study have shown overall response rates for patients with T790M-mediated acquired resistance ranging from 62-70% with a median PFS ranging from 9.9-12.3 months (8,9). Moreover, when compared to platinum chemotherapy, osimertinib is markedly more effective in this patient cohort, with an ORR of 71% vs. 31%, respectively (10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%