2019
DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyz041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Osimertinib for patients with EGFR T790M mutation-positive non–small-cell lung cancer and a poor performance status

Abstract: Background Osimertinib is a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that is effective against EGFR T790M mutation-positive non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients who have good performance status (PS). However, the efficacy and safety of osimertinib for patients with poor PS is unknown. Methods We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of osimertinib in patien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Median duration of the sequential treatment strategy was 31.3 months in patients with ECOG 0-1 and 22.2 months in patients with ECOG ≥ 2 (p < 0.001) [13]. Recently, results of osimertinib treatment in a group of 30 patients with moderate performance status (ECOG 2-3) have been published, in which 53% of patients attained objective responses to treatment and median PFS was 8.2 months [14]. The majority of the subjects (63%) had an improvement in their general condition and the rates of adverse reactions and treatment-related deaths were in line with expectations based on other reports in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Median duration of the sequential treatment strategy was 31.3 months in patients with ECOG 0-1 and 22.2 months in patients with ECOG ≥ 2 (p < 0.001) [13]. Recently, results of osimertinib treatment in a group of 30 patients with moderate performance status (ECOG 2-3) have been published, in which 53% of patients attained objective responses to treatment and median PFS was 8.2 months [14]. The majority of the subjects (63%) had an improvement in their general condition and the rates of adverse reactions and treatment-related deaths were in line with expectations based on other reports in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the cohort size was very small (18 patients). Moreover, our present study included only two patients with a PS score of 4, while our previous retrospective study included no patients with a PS score of 4 [14]. Therefore, the potential clinical benefit of osimertinib for patients with PS score of 4 remains unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The median PFS was approximately 3 months for the carboplatin plus paclitaxel therapy for Japanese patients with NSCLC and PS 2 [18]. In our previous study, the median PFS was 8.2 months for osimertinib therapy for patients with NSCLC and poor PS [14]. Therefore, the PFS threshold of 3.0 months and an expected PFS of 8.2 months was set for the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A study conducted using real‐world data before the launch of osimertinib revealed that there was no difference in OS between second‐line treatments and that ECOG PS was a prognostic factor 26 . ECOG PS improved in T790M‐positive lung cancer patients after treatment with osimertinib 27 . However, real‐world data showed that the median OS (9 months) of patients with ECOG PS ≥2 patients treated with osimertinib as second‐line therapy was shorter than patients with ECOG PS 0 or 1 28 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%