2012
DOI: 10.1097/mbp.0b013e328353ff63
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oscillometric estimation of central blood pressure

Abstract: Oscillometric noninvasive estimation of central BP with the Mobil-O-Graph BP device is as effective as using the well-established SphygmoCor applanation tonometry device. In comparison, the Mobil-O-Graph combines the widespread benefits of brachial BP measurement and also provides central BP within one measurement.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
75
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bland-Altman analysis in the present study showed wider SDs and 95% limits of agreement for the comparison between Sphygmocor- and Mobil-O-Graph-derived parameters relative to those reported in previous validation studies conducted in non-renal populations [16,17,18,19]. Because Mobil-O-Graph device was originally designed to obtain measurements in the general and not in specific diseased populations, we cannot exclude the possibility that factors related to the disease status of ESRD patients (i.e., the severely impaired mechanical arterial properties of these patients, presence of arteriovenous anastomoses, dialysis vintage or other factors) may have influenced the ARCSolver algorithms, resulting in a wider scatter of the Mobil-O-Graph-derived indices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Bland-Altman analysis in the present study showed wider SDs and 95% limits of agreement for the comparison between Sphygmocor- and Mobil-O-Graph-derived parameters relative to those reported in previous validation studies conducted in non-renal populations [16,17,18,19]. Because Mobil-O-Graph device was originally designed to obtain measurements in the general and not in specific diseased populations, we cannot exclude the possibility that factors related to the disease status of ESRD patients (i.e., the severely impaired mechanical arterial properties of these patients, presence of arteriovenous anastomoses, dialysis vintage or other factors) may have influenced the ARCSolver algorithms, resulting in a wider scatter of the Mobil-O-Graph-derived indices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The good agreement between the test and reference devices is supported by another analysis of aSBP measurements performed in 100 hypertensive individuals studied in static conditions. In this study, the Bland-Altman analysis revealed a mean-between-method difference of 0.5 mm Hg and 95% limits of agreement ranging from -8.37 to 9.37 mm Hg [19]. Finally, in a recently published study, Luzardo et al confirmed that irrespective of measurement conditions (static or ambulatory), the Mobil-O-Graph device provided similar aSBP estimates with static tonometric measurements by the Sphygmocor device [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…GmbH, Stolberg, Germany), which is the first automated self‐measurement ambulatory blood pressure monitoring device that uses brachial oscillometric blood pressure for a non‐invasive estimation of central blood pressure 15, 16. This device uses a novel transfer function‐like method (ARCSolver algorithm) with brachial cuff‐based waveform recordings, and its measurements of blood pressure, waveform, and PWV have been validated 15, 16, 25, 26. PWV measured by this device has a good correlation with that measured by traditionally used tonometry systems 25, 26.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This device uses a novel transfer function‐like method (ARCSolver algorithm) with brachial cuff‐based waveform recordings, and its measurements of blood pressure, waveform, and PWV have been validated 15, 16, 25, 26. PWV measured by this device has a good correlation with that measured by traditionally used tonometry systems 25, 26. We evaluated PWV in patients with stable HF.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%