2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oscillatory Dynamics Supporting Semantic Cognition: MEG Evidence for the Contribution of the Anterior Temporal Lobe Hub and Modality-Specific Spokes

Abstract: The “hub and spoke model” of semantic representation suggests that the multimodal features of objects are drawn together by an anterior temporal lobe (ATL) “hub”, while modality-specific “spokes” capture perceptual/action features. However, relatively little is known about how these components are recruited through time to support object identification. We used magnetoencephalography to measure neural oscillations within left ATL, lateral fusiform cortex (FC) and central sulcus (CS) during word-picture matchin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
58
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
6
58
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Crucially, recurrent activity will be associated with the activation of semantic object information that will also depend on the coordinated activity within the VVP. Whilst visual object properties are predicted in alpha (VanRullen et al, 2014), semantic information may be more associated with theta activity (Halgren et al, 2015) and gamma activity (Mollo et al, 2017;Supp et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Crucially, recurrent activity will be associated with the activation of semantic object information that will also depend on the coordinated activity within the VVP. Whilst visual object properties are predicted in alpha (VanRullen et al, 2014), semantic information may be more associated with theta activity (Halgren et al, 2015) and gamma activity (Mollo et al, 2017;Supp et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The outputs of the three spatial filters at each point in the brain were summed to generate estimates of oscillatory power. This analysis strategy and the parameters used for the current study were similar to those used in recent MEG studies of visual word recognition, object naming and semantic processing (Wheat et al, 2010;Klein et al, 2014;Urooj, 2014;Mollo et al, 2017).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time-frequency representations of total power were normalized, separately for each condition and for each participant, with respect to the mean power per frequency bin in a baseline period prior to the start of trials in that condition (-700 to -500 ms). This window length was also used in earlier studies (Mollo et al, 2017;Wheat et al, 2010;Klein et al, 2014), since it provides a compromise between the minimum length sufficient to estimate power at the lowest frequency reported here (i.e., 5Hz) and the requirement to characterise the state of the brain immediately before the onset of each trial.…”
Section: Time-frequency Analysis: Point Of Interest (Poi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations