Oscillatory correlations between external force and damping

Feng-wu, Zou

doi:10.1007/bf01899559

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There are many types of commonly used energy-efficiency evaluation methods. According to the theoretical basis for each evaluation method, these can be divided into four categories: expert evaluation methods, such as expert scoring and comprehensive methods; operations research and other mathematical methods, such as analytical hierarchy process (AHP) [15], data envelopment analysis (DEA) [16,17] and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation [18]; new evaluation methods, such as the artificial neural network evaluation method [19] and grayscale comprehensive evaluation method [20]; and hybrid methods, such as the fuzzy neural network evaluation method [21].What these methods have in common is to convert multiple indicators that describe different characteristics of an object into a single indicator that reflects the overall situation. The difference between them is the selection of indicators, the establishment of principles, and the calculation of weights.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Energy‐Efficiency Evaluation of Gas Sweetening Based on Yield‐Energy‐Selectivity Indicators

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The high‐sulfur gas sweetening process is energy consuming. To analyze its energy efficiency effectively, and look for ways to improve this process, a novel energy‐efficiency evaluation method based on the yield‐energy‐selectivity and efficiency coefficient methods was proposed. First, the yield, energy, and selectivity are selected as evaluation indicators to establish the yield‐energy‐selectivity evaluation model. Then, the coefficient and score of each indicator were determined by using the analytical hierarchy process and efficacy coefficient method, respectively. Finally, the proposed energy‐efficiency evaluation method was applied to the actual high‐sulfur gas sweetening process. The evaluation results were in good agreement with those obtained by actual experiences.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%