2015
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/807/1/96
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OSCILLATOR STRENGTH MEASUREMENT FOR THEA(0–6)–X(0),C(0)–X(0), ANDE(0)–X(0) TRANSITIONS OF CO BY THE DIPOLE (γ,γ) METHOD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…47,123 For the lowest and well-studied Π ES, the present 8.46±0.01 eV Δ𝐸 vert value is close to our recent FCI estimate (8.48 eV) 5 as well as to the experimental value (8.51 eV) deduced with the help of the measured spectroscopic constants and the reconstruction of the potential energy surfaces. 124 The computed value of 𝑓 = 0.165 is in very reasonable agreement with the estimates obtained by dipole (e,e) and (𝛾,𝛾) spectroscopies: 0.181 119 and 0.194, 121 respectively. We refer the interested readers to Tables 3 and 4 The two Stark effect measurements we are aware of yield 𝜇 ES = −0.15 ± 0.05 D (analysis of the 0-0 band) 120 and 𝜇 ES = −0.34 ± 0.01 D (two-photon LIF), 122 which are also somehow inconsistent, yet of the same order of magnitude as our GS and ES values, respectively.…”
Section: Cosupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…47,123 For the lowest and well-studied Π ES, the present 8.46±0.01 eV Δ𝐸 vert value is close to our recent FCI estimate (8.48 eV) 5 as well as to the experimental value (8.51 eV) deduced with the help of the measured spectroscopic constants and the reconstruction of the potential energy surfaces. 124 The computed value of 𝑓 = 0.165 is in very reasonable agreement with the estimates obtained by dipole (e,e) and (𝛾,𝛾) spectroscopies: 0.181 119 and 0.194, 121 respectively. We refer the interested readers to Tables 3 and 4 The two Stark effect measurements we are aware of yield 𝜇 ES = −0.15 ± 0.05 D (analysis of the 0-0 band) 120 and 𝜇 ES = −0.34 ± 0.01 D (two-photon LIF), 122 which are also somehow inconsistent, yet of the same order of magnitude as our GS and ES values, respectively.…”
Section: Cosupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The second Rydberg Σ + transition is much more dipoleallowed than the first, and our TBE/CBS of 0.146 ± 0.016 for the oscillator strength is consistent with the most recent measurement (0.136). 121 The dipole moment of this ES is large, positive, and rather unaffected by structural relaxation effects (Table S4 in the Supporting Information), our extrapolated value of 4.94 ± 0.47 D agreeing well with the two available experimental estimates: 4.52 ± 0.35 120 and 4.50 ± 0.07 D. 122 Eventually, for the highest ES of CO considered herein, the extrapolated f value perfectly fits the measurements. 119,121 We provide, as far as we know, the first estimate of its dipole moment, which is rather small and negative (see bottom of Table 5).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The vibronic states can be resolved with the good energy resolution in Xu et al [], but the moderate incident electron energy of 300 eV may not be high enough to approach the first Born approximation. With the dramatic development of third generation synchrotron radiation and the crystal spectrometer, the brightness and the energy resolution of the X‐ray scattering technique have been greatly improved, which provides the possibility for the measurements of the dynamic parameters of atoms and molecules [ Xie et al , ; Bradley et al , ; Zhu et al , ; Liu et al , ; Peng et al , ; Kang et al , ; Xu et al , ; Liu et al , ]. Recently, the X‐ray scattering results, which are free from the high‐order Born terms, were obtained by Bradley et al [] and Peng et al [] at the energy resolutions of 1 eV and 70 meV, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have introduced an approach to compute highly accurate excited-state solutions of the electronic Schrödinger equation for molecules by using deep neural networks that are trained in an unsupervised manner with variational Monte Carlo. We have employed the PauliNet architecture [29] to approximate the ground- [42,54,55]; excitation energies from CC [50][51][52][56][57][58][59], DFT [58][59][60][61] and TBE [50,51,56,62,63]; oscillator strengths from (MR-)CC [50-52, 64, 65], DFT [66] and experiment [67][68][69][70][71]. Left: Convergence of the total energy of the ground state (red) and excited state (light red) with training.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%