2015
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv2408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oscillations of superfluid hyperon stars: decoupling scheme and g-modes

Abstract: We analyse the oscillations of general relativistic superfluid hyperon stars, following the approach suggested by Gusakov & Kantor and Gusakov et al. and generalizing it to the nucleon-hyperon matter. We show that the equations governing the oscillations can be split into two weakly coupled systems with the coupling parameters s e , s µ , and s str . The approximation s e = s µ = s str = 0 (decoupling approximation) allows one to drastically simplify the calculations of stellar oscillation spectra. An efficien… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analysis did not account for hyperons, which are expected to appear at high core densities (∼ 7 × 10 14 g cm −3 ; see, e.g., Bednarek et al 2012;Weissenborn et al 2012;Gusakov et al 2014). As Dommes & Gusakov (2016) point out, gradients in the hyperon fraction might also be a source of buoyancy in superfluid NSs. While the direct Urca process involving hyperons (see review by Yakovlev et al 2001) may be fast enough compared to the g mode oscillation period to break the assumption of frozen composition, and/or the hyperons may be superfluid themselves (Takatsuka et al 2006;Wang & Shen 2010), the case studied by Dommes & Gusakov (2016) nonetheless shows that there can exist additional g modes in hyperonic NSs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our analysis did not account for hyperons, which are expected to appear at high core densities (∼ 7 × 10 14 g cm −3 ; see, e.g., Bednarek et al 2012;Weissenborn et al 2012;Gusakov et al 2014). As Dommes & Gusakov (2016) point out, gradients in the hyperon fraction might also be a source of buoyancy in superfluid NSs. While the direct Urca process involving hyperons (see review by Yakovlev et al 2001) may be fast enough compared to the g mode oscillation period to break the assumption of frozen composition, and/or the hyperons may be superfluid themselves (Takatsuka et al 2006;Wang & Shen 2010), the case studied by Dommes & Gusakov (2016) nonetheless shows that there can exist additional g modes in hyperonic NSs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stationary phase approximation impliesh(f ) 2 = h(t) 2 |dt/df |, where the gravitational wave frequency evolution, df/dt, is derived directly from equation (1). Equation (20) assumes an optimal matched filter, which is most likely not feasible for the detection of such long-lived (i.e. 10 s) transient signals.…”
Section: B Magnetic Mountains In Newly-born Magnetars and In Known Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conditions for chemical equilibrium due to weak interactions are (Dommes & Gusakov 2016), Both models have a muonic contribution that peaks in the outer core. The HS has an additional contribution due to hyperons that peaks in the inner core.…”
Section: Superfluid Models With Hyperonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We partially assess the impact of this hybrid approach by redoing the calculation of the g-modes using the GR oscillation equations. For this calculation, we ignore the gravitational perturbations (i.e., we adopt the Cowling approximation) and solve the superfluid GR oscillation equations (see, e.g., Dommes & Gusakov 2016;Passamonti et al 2016). We find that our hybrid approach overestimates the g-mode eigenfrequencies by 70% (see grey lines in Fig.…”
Section: Eigenmodes Of a Superfluid Hyperon Starmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation