1996
DOI: 10.1029/96gl00383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oscillations in polar mesospheric summer echoes and bifurcation of noctilucent cloud formation

Abstract: Oscillations having periods of 5.5 days are found in polar mesospheric summer echoes (PMSEs) observed during 1980 to 1984 with the MST radar at Poker Flat, Alaska. Simulations of noctilucent cloud (NLC) formation are made in the case that embryos for cloud ice particles are proton‐hydrates H+(H2O)n (PHs). Results show that cloud formation bifurcates from a stably steady structure into a quasi‐steady and a stably oscillatory structure in accordance with an increase of humidity. By capturing electrons, descendin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A cyclical behavior of the ice clouds is undoubtedly due to the feedback between ice sedimentation and sublimation, followed by upwelling of the gas phase water vapor back into the cold region. A similar cyclical pattern was discussed by Sugiyama et al (1996). The non-stationary behavior seen here illustrates the difficulty in choosing the proper part of the cloud lifecycle to compare with observations.…”
Section: Carma Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…A cyclical behavior of the ice clouds is undoubtedly due to the feedback between ice sedimentation and sublimation, followed by upwelling of the gas phase water vapor back into the cold region. A similar cyclical pattern was discussed by Sugiyama et al (1996). The non-stationary behavior seen here illustrates the difficulty in choosing the proper part of the cloud lifecycle to compare with observations.…”
Section: Carma Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Our data demonstrate that 4-day, 5-day and 6-day time intervals are present in the NLC periodicity. A 5-day period is well-known in NLCs (Gadsden, 1985;Sugiyama et al, 1996;Kirkwood and Stebel, 2003;Merkel et al, 2003) and is usually associated with a free traveling quasi 5-day planetary wave of zonal wave number 1. Note that theoretical considerations (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Planetary waves disturb the summer mesosphere temperature (Espy and Witt, 1996) to such a degree that a strong correlation exists between the probability of NLC appearance and the combined effect of stationary, 16-day and 5-day planetary waves (Kirkwood and Stebel, 2003). The 5-day period in NLCs was detected using ground-based observations (Gadsden, 1985;Sugiyama et al, 1996;Kirkwood and Stebel, 2003). The signatures of the 5-day planetary wave were also observed in PMCs from satellite data (Merkel et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Nanometer-sized smoke particles have traditionally been the 'nuclei of choice', being used in all major model studies with the exception of the studies by Sugiyama (1994) and Sugiyama et al (1996). Originally, it has been proposed that these particles form as a product of meteoroid ablation in the altitude range between 75 and 115 km (Rosinski and Snow, 1961;Hunten et al, 1980).…”
Section: Nuclei For Mesospheric Ice Particlesmentioning
confidence: 98%