1994
DOI: 10.1006/jmaa.1994.1362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oscillation in First Order Neutral Differential Equations with "Integrally Small" Coefficients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(3.18) when 3/2 < β 2. Thus our condition (3.11) is better than condition (11) in [14], and so Theorem 3.2 and Theorem 3.3 improve and extend Theorem 1 and Theorem 3 in [14], respectively.…”
Section: This Implies That −Z(t) Is a Positive Solution Of The Inequamentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(3.18) when 3/2 < β 2. Thus our condition (3.11) is better than condition (11) in [14], and so Theorem 3.2 and Theorem 3.3 improve and extend Theorem 1 and Theorem 3 in [14], respectively.…”
Section: This Implies That −Z(t) Is a Positive Solution Of The Inequamentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Remark 3.2. It should be noted that condition (11) in [14] is not satisfied for Eq. (3.18) when 3/2 < β 2.…”
Section: This Implies That −Z(t) Is a Positive Solution Of The Inequamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently Li and Saker [22] considered the equation (1.1) when a(t) = 1 and given some finite sufficient conditions for oscillation of all solutions and applied these results to the logistic neutral delay differential equations. For further oscillation results when (1.5) does not hold we refer the reader to the articles by Yu [26,27] and Yu et al [29,30,31]. Our aim in this paper in Section 2 is to give some new integral sufficient conditions for oscillation of all solutions of equation (1.1) and show that the combined growth of P and Q without the condition (1.8) in the linear case can give oscillation even when (1.5) and (1.6) fail.…”
Section: X(t) = φ(T) For T ∈ [T 1 − ρ T 1 ] (14)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acknowledgement The authors thanks the referee for his helpful suggestions and his excellent list of the references [26,27,29,30,31].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To see this, observe that Note that if we choose f t ≡ 0 in Example 4.2, then (3.1) will not be satisfied. We also remark that by applying Theorem 4 in [18], we see that all solutions of (4.3) are oscillatory. Therefore, Example 4.2 demonstrates the persistence of oscillation of all solutions of (4.3) under the impulsive perturbations (4.4).…”
Section: Lemma 25 Consider the Impulsive Differential Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 94%