1995
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9939-1995-1242082-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oscillation and nonoscillation criteria for delay differential equations

Abstract: Abstract. Oscillation and nonoscillation criteria for the first-order delay differential equationare established in the case where

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the autonomous case (4.4), the converse of Corollary 4.3 in general is not true. Under the hypotheses of the corollary, it may happen that all solutions of (4.1) are oscillatory and the characteristic equation (4.5) of the limiting equation (4.4) has a real root (see the example in [12, p. 320] or [4,Remark 3]). …”
Section: Proposition 42 Consider the Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the autonomous case (4.4), the converse of Corollary 4.3 in general is not true. Under the hypotheses of the corollary, it may happen that all solutions of (4.1) are oscillatory and the characteristic equation (4.5) of the limiting equation (4.4) has a real root (see the example in [12, p. 320] or [4,Remark 3]). …”
Section: Proposition 42 Consider the Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of this method, Koplatadze and Chanturiya [9] have constructed the oscillation theory for a wide class of second and higher order nonlinear functional-differential equations. In the present paper, using the above mentioned method, new and optimal in a certain sense conditions guarantee, respectively, the oscillation of all proper solutions of equation (1) and the existence of both remote from zero and vanishing at infinity proper Kneser solutions of that equation are obtained. The next proposition follows immediately from condition (2).…”
Section: Msc 2010: 34c15 34k11 34k12mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A continuous function u : [a, +∞[ → ℝ is said to be a solution of the differential equation (1) if it is continuously differentiable in some interval ]a , +∞[ ⊂ ]a, +∞[, and in this interval it satisfies equation (1). • A solution u of the differential equation (1), defined on the interval [a, +∞[, is said to be proper if it is not identically zero in any neighborhood of +∞, i.e., there exists a sequence t k ∈ [a , +∞[ (k = , , .…”
Section: Msc 2010: 34c15 34k11 34k12mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Condition (2) shows that the oscillation of all solutions of the sublinear equation (1) is determined only by the coefficient p(t), and is independent of the delay τ(t).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%