2011
DOI: 10.1299/jsmeatem.2011.10._os12f018-
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OS12F018 Fracture Mechanics Evaluation of Mode I and Mode II Fiber/Matrix Interfacial Crack by Using Real-Size Model Composite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kotaki et al [18] and Hojo et al [19] reported that the crack propagation behavior in FRP is strongly influenced by the interfacial bonding between fiber and matrix. Koiwa et al [20] introduced the measurement on the interfacial fracture toughness of Mode I and Mode II crack growth by using real size model composite. They reported a significant increase in fracture toughness with increasing bonding length.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kotaki et al [18] and Hojo et al [19] reported that the crack propagation behavior in FRP is strongly influenced by the interfacial bonding between fiber and matrix. Koiwa et al [20] introduced the measurement on the interfacial fracture toughness of Mode I and Mode II crack growth by using real size model composite. They reported a significant increase in fracture toughness with increasing bonding length.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crack propagation behavior on fiber-reinforced composites was strongly influenced by the interface between the fiber and the matrix as reported by Kotaki et al [38] and Hojo et al [39]. However, the evaluation of interfacial fracture toughness by using a real size composite model can be measured by Mode I/Mode II crack growth as examined by Koiwa et al [40], who reported that the increasing bonding length caused an improved interfacial fracture toughness. However, the results of the measurement of fracture toughness were obtained in a very short matrix size range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%