2003
DOI: 10.1249/01.mss.0000089352.47259.ca
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orthotic Comfort Is Related to Kinematics, Kinetics, and EMG in Recreational Runners

Abstract: In general, comfort is an important and relevant feature of foot orthoses. Evaluations of foot orthoses using comfort do not only reflect subjective perceptions but also differences in functional biomechanical variables. Future research should focus on defining the relationship between comfort and biomechanical variables for material modifications of footwear, different modes of locomotion, and the general population.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
74
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
74
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the players' subjective feeling of comfort seems to be a better indicator of the actual performance than the subjective performance rating. This notion is supported by earlier findings suggesting that the subjective feeling of comfort is a significant biomechanical variable [9][10][11].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…However, the players' subjective feeling of comfort seems to be a better indicator of the actual performance than the subjective performance rating. This notion is supported by earlier findings suggesting that the subjective feeling of comfort is a significant biomechanical variable [9][10][11].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…6,27 Similarly, the use of shock-absorbing insoles or orthoses has been found to reduce PPA, IP, ALR, and ILR by as much as 16%, 10%, 18%, and 23%, respectively. 14,32,33 Although the reductions in PPA, IP, ALR, and ILR through the use of shoes or orthoses were significant, subjects 1, 2, and 3 achieved larger reductions through the use of real-time visual feedback of tibial acceleration (TaBle). In addition, subjects 1 and 2 had reductions in PPA (FiGUre 3) that brought their PPA values within the normal range of PPA, which is roughly 3 to 8 g. 10,16,23,30 For subjects 4 and 5, their PPA values remained above 8 g (FiGUre 3), and they did not achieve the same reductions in IP, ALR, and ILR as the other subjects (TaBle).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference can be considered clinically relevant 35 and may be important because orthotic comfort has been related to muscle activation. 36 The lower hardness level of the custom foot orthoses may further explain this observation, given that softer foot orthoses generally are considered to be more comfortable. 20 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%