2020
DOI: 10.1007/s40519-020-00896-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orthorexia Nervosa Inventory (ONI): development and validation of a new measure of orthorexic symptomatology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

19
105
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
19
105
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the ORTO-15 test, ON prevalence rates range from 6% to nearly 90% [30]. While using the DOS, ON incidence ranges from 1% to 8% [31]. Such diversity of ON prevalence could result from the difference in the psychometric quality of the questionnaires [32,33] and lack of an optimal cut-off value (e.g., a cutoff score of 35 based on the ORTO-15 [27]; a cutoff score of 30 or higher based on the DOS [29]; a cuttoff score of 72 based on the ONI [31]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using the ORTO-15 test, ON prevalence rates range from 6% to nearly 90% [30]. While using the DOS, ON incidence ranges from 1% to 8% [31]. Such diversity of ON prevalence could result from the difference in the psychometric quality of the questionnaires [32,33] and lack of an optimal cut-off value (e.g., a cutoff score of 35 based on the ORTO-15 [27]; a cutoff score of 30 or higher based on the DOS [29]; a cuttoff score of 72 based on the ONI [31]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While using the DOS, ON incidence ranges from 1% to 8% [31]. Such diversity of ON prevalence could result from the difference in the psychometric quality of the questionnaires [32,33] and lack of an optimal cut-off value (e.g., a cutoff score of 35 based on the ORTO-15 [27]; a cutoff score of 30 or higher based on the DOS [29]; a cuttoff score of 72 based on the ONI [31]). Although the ORTO-15 has good predictive validity [27], the lack of basic psychometric properties and the internal consistency has been criticized [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Although there are several better measures than ORTO-11 to assess orthorexic tendencies like the Eating Habits Questionnaire, the Orthorexia Nervosa Inventory, and the Düsseldorf Orthorexia Scale, we could not use them since they have not yet been validated in Turkish. [45][46][47] We did not question whether the participants in our sample did intense exercises or why they did exercise. To generalize this study's results, longitudinal studies involving participants from different cultures, investigating obsessive-compulsive personality traits, and examining personality traits' effects on orthorexic behaviors would be useful.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of ON symptoms is less than 1% in the US sample [7], 4.5% in university students [8], 21.4% of pregnant women [9], and 35-57.8% in high-risk groups (for example, artists, athletes, healthcare professionals, and performance artists) [10]. Women are signi cantly more concerned with having a slim body image and dieting than men, and as a result, are more prone to an eating disorder risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%