2019
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2018.2885086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orthorectification of Planetary Linear Pushbroom Images Based on an Improved Back-Projection Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two Chandrayaan-1 M3 images were acquired with summing mode and the macropixels value was 2. It is noted that the computational performance of this experiment was not as good as that presented in (Geng et al, 2018), due to that virtual machine was used in this test. However, the results still show that the computational efficiency of the developed method is much better than that of ISIS, due to the optimized ground-to-image transformation algorithm.…”
Section: Orthophotos Generation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The two Chandrayaan-1 M3 images were acquired with summing mode and the macropixels value was 2. It is noted that the computational performance of this experiment was not as good as that presented in (Geng et al, 2018), due to that virtual machine was used in this test. However, the results still show that the computational efficiency of the developed method is much better than that of ISIS, due to the optimized ground-to-image transformation algorithm.…”
Section: Orthophotos Generation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…ASP also uses the ISIS sensor model to process planetary images. However, it is noted that the computational efficiency of the ISIS pushbroom sensor model is unsatisfactory, especially in ground-to-image transformation algorithm (Geng et al, 2018). Additionally, to apply more powerful photogrammetric features, commercial photogrammetric workstation such as BAE Systems' SOCET SET is always adopted (Kirk et al, 2008;Kirk et al, 2017).…”
Section: Existing Pushbroom Sensor Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To evaluate the computational efficiency, we compared the proposed method with two representative methods, namely, the cutting‐edge CPP‐based method and the classical bisection method. It is noted that the CPP‐based method delivers high computational efficiency for the linear pushbroom images without distortions (Geng et al, ; Wang et al, ), whereas the bisection method is widely used but shows relatively lower efficiency. The results are shown in Figure .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the case of a linear array camera with distortions, the CPP of the scan line becomes a 3‐D curved surface instead of a 3‐D plane. Consequently, to apply the CPP‐based method, the curved shape linear array should be segmented into multiple short line segments, such that the exact CPP corresponding to the ground point can be determined (Geng et al, ). These additional procedures cause the CPP‐based method to be relatively difficult to implement for the linear pushbroom images with distortions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%