2007
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.89b5.18903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orthopaedic metals and their potential toxicity in the arthroplasty patient

Abstract: The long-term effects of metal-on-metal arthroplasty are currently under scrutiny because of the potential biological effects of metal wear debris. This review summarises data describing the release, dissemination, uptake, biological activity, and potential toxicity of metal wear debris released from alloys currently used in modern orthopaedics. The introduction of risk assessment for the evaluation of metal alloys and their use in arthroplasty patients is discussed and this should include potential harmful ef… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
196
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 293 publications
(208 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
2
196
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this process, the generation of wear debris, especially polyethylene, and their biological effects on periprosthetic tissues are an important factor determining implant removal [1][2][3]. Implantation of hip prostheses in younger, more active patients has led to a renewed interest and development of third-generation hard-on-hard bearings, including metal-on-metal (MOM) and ceramic-on-ceramic (COC).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this process, the generation of wear debris, especially polyethylene, and their biological effects on periprosthetic tissues are an important factor determining implant removal [1][2][3]. Implantation of hip prostheses in younger, more active patients has led to a renewed interest and development of third-generation hard-on-hard bearings, including metal-on-metal (MOM) and ceramic-on-ceramic (COC).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For hand applications the irritation of overlying free gliding tendons in contact with the plate is also of concern (Nazzal et al, 2006). Furthermore, the negative influence of metal ions and salts on adjacent tissues and organs is well documented (Case et al, 1994: Kasai et al, 2003: Keegan et al, 2007Summer et al, 2007). Device extraction in children can further cloud the matter (Rosson and Shearer, 1991;Kahle, 1994;Alzahrani et al, 2003;Kim et al, 2005;Peterson, 2005;Busam et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,9,10 Adverse soft tissue reactions causing local tissue damage, 1 pain, 2,9,11-16 metallosis and metal ions potentially being carcinogenic were the main concerns (ARMD). [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] Implants such as the ASR system (DePuy Orthopaedics, Johnson & Johnson, Warsaw, IN, USA) experienced high failure rates and were recalled from the market. [25][26][27][28] The same concerns were extended to all metal on metal bearing hip replacements/resurfacings and in 2012 The Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) (UK) issued guidelines to assess the performance and safety of these implants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%