“…and the Bernstein inequality [11], we obtain √ a m m m τ P M ϕu [θa m ,+∞) ≤ C √ a m m m τ e −Am P M ϕu ≤ Cm τ e −Am P M u ≤ Ce −Am P M uand, thenT * m (w, (1 − χ)P M )u ≤ Ce −Am P M u easily follows.Now we can prove Theorem 3.2.Proof. [Proof of Theorem 3.2] Denoting byP N ∈ IP N , N = M log M , M = θm1+θ , the polynomial of best approximation of f ∈ Cū, we can writef − F m (w, f ) = f − P N + H m (w, P N ) − F m (w, f ) = f − P N + F m (w, P N − f ) + T m (w, P N ) + H m (w, (1 − χ)P N ),using Lemma 3.1 and Proposition 4.1, we get( f − F m (w, f ))u ≤ C ( f − P N )ū + √ a N N P N ϕū + e −Am P Nū .Recalling(10) we have( f − P N )ū ≤ Cω ϕ f,Moreover, since (see[15] for a similar argument) √ a N N P N ϕū ≤ Cω ϕ f, fū , the theorem follows.Proof. [Proof of Theorem 3.3] By (3)-(4) and (18) we have f − G m (w, f ) = [ f − F m (w, f )] +F m (w, f ), whereF m (w, f ) = x 1 ≤x k ≤θa m (x)v k (x) f (x k ).…”