2014
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-s6-s12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orthology and paralogy constraints: satisfiability and consistency

Abstract: BackgroundA variety of methods based on sequence similarity, reconciliation, synteny or functional characteristics, can be used to infer orthology and paralogy relations between genes of a given gene family  G. But is a given set  C of orthology/paralogy constraints possible, i.e., can they simultaneously co-exist in an evolutionary history for  G? While previous studies have focused on full sets of constraints, here we consider the general case where  C does not necessarily involve a constraint for each pair … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
60
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…T ) along with the species assignment s , is consistent if there exists a species tree S such that ( G,s ) (resp. ( T,s )) is consistent with S [9]. …”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…T ) along with the species assignment s , is consistent if there exists a species tree S such that ( G,s ) (resp. ( T,s )) is consistent with S [9]. …”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…In this paper, we extend the results of [9] by giving a O ( n 3 ) time algorithm to decide whether is consistent, even when the species tree is not known and is not full, and show an application on real data. Thus the problems of deciding satisfiability, deciding consistency given a species tree, and deciding consistency with an unknown species tree, are all polynomial-time solvable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations