2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2008.00259.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orthokeratology practice in children in a university clinic in Hong Kong*

Abstract: Purposes:The aim of this study was to analyse clinical data of children undergoing orthokeratology (ortho-k) and to investigate patients'/parents' perspective on ortho-k via telephone interviews. Methods: Clinical records of children undergoing ortho-k from a university optometry clinic were reviewed and the effects of ortho-k on refraction, vision and cornea were investigated. A telephone interview was conducted to solicit patients'/parents' perspective of the treatment. Results: One hundred and eight files w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
56
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(83 reference statements)
6
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…80.5% of subjects were successfully fit with the initial empirically fit lens, an additional 15% were successful with only one lens change, 4% more with a second lens change and the remaining 0.5% with a third lens change. Our results of high first lens fitting success are in agreement with the outcomes of Chan [41] who reported a first lens fitting success of 73.5% and second lens success of 90.0%. Experience in fitting of the corneal reshaping lens design did not seem to have any influence on the success of empirical fitting based on the fact that eight of the ten investigators had no clinical experience in fitting the Emerald lens design prior to participating in the SMART study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…80.5% of subjects were successfully fit with the initial empirically fit lens, an additional 15% were successful with only one lens change, 4% more with a second lens change and the remaining 0.5% with a third lens change. Our results of high first lens fitting success are in agreement with the outcomes of Chan [41] who reported a first lens fitting success of 73.5% and second lens success of 90.0%. Experience in fitting of the corneal reshaping lens design did not seem to have any influence on the success of empirical fitting based on the fact that eight of the ten investigators had no clinical experience in fitting the Emerald lens design prior to participating in the SMART study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Several studies have focused exclusively on young people and have concluded that corneal reshaping has great promise as an effective method of controlling myopia progression [3,[40][41][42][43][44]. Changes in axial length (AL) and vitreous chamber depth (VCD) appear to be the important anatomic factor to control myopia progression Cho et al [45] monitored AL and VCD over a two year period with 35 children aged 7-12; this group was compared to a spectacle-wearing control group from a previous study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The visual recovery after application of orthokeratology lens was statistically highly significant. Similar result has been reported in various studies in different ethnic communities [8][9][10][11]. There were 6 patients in 8-12 year age group and 8 between 13 to 17 years.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Certain adverse effects have been reported in literature. Corneal staining has been most commonly observed which improved with ocular lubricants [14]. Central punctate staining was observed in 2 out of 40 eyes which also improved with ocular lubricants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Subjects and parents engaged enthusiastically in the study and responded well to initial introduction of the study design and protocol. The number of contact lenses required to achieve an optimum fit were either lower than 31 or similar to 32 those reported in previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 46%