2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.05.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orthographic transparency and grapheme–phoneme conversion: An ERP study in Arabic and French readers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
52
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
6
52
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They found no early effects of phonology in ERPs. Simon et al (2006) found phonological effects at 320 ms (N320) in a lexical decision task.…”
Section: Orthographic and Phonological Processing In The Brainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found no early effects of phonology in ERPs. Simon et al (2006) found phonological effects at 320 ms (N320) in a lexical decision task.…”
Section: Orthographic and Phonological Processing In The Brainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, monolingual Italian readers showed stronger activity than English readers in left superior temporal areas, associated with phonological non-lexical processes. Investigating lexical decision in French-Arabic bilinguals (with Arabic being the relatively deep orthography), Simon, Bernard, Lalonde, and Rebai (2006) showed that the N320, a component associated with spelling-to-sound conversion (Ashby, Sanders, & Kingston, 2009;Bentin, Mouchetant-Rostaing, Giard, Echallier, & Pernier, 1999;Carreiras, Perea, Vergara, & Pollatsek, 2009;Grainger, Kiyonaga, & Holcomb, 2006;Hauk, Davis, Ford, Pulvermuller, & Marslen-Wilson, 2006;Huang, Itoh, Suwazono, & Nakada, 2004;Proverbio, Vecchi, & Zani, 2004;Simon, Bernard, Largy, Lalonde, & Rebai, 2004;Simon et al, 2006), differentiated French and Arabic words. Similarly, Bar-Kochva and Breznitz (2012) showed larger event-related potential amplitudes to a deep (unpointed) than shallow (pointed) version of Hebrew script 340 ms after word-onset when they were presented to Hebrew bilinguals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…by comparing pointed versus unpointed Hebrew scripts (Bar-Kochva & Breznitz, 2012), which may lead to confounds related to unbalanced familiarity and/or frequency across orthographic depth. Finally, bilingual EEG reading studies on the effect of orthographic depth (Bar-Kochva & Breznitz, 2012;Simon et al, 2006) did not perform analysis in the brain space, limiting conclusions about the brain pathways underlying the effects observed at the scalp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a common problem for most of the previous studies that used real words, pseudowords, letter strings, and false fonts (Bentin et al, 1999;Brem et al, 2006;Martin, Nazir, Thierry, Paulignan, & Demonet, 2006;Maurer et al, 2006), native and foreign words or letters (Liu & Perfetti, 2003;Wong et al, 2005), and different writing systems (Maurer, Zevin, et al, 2008;Simon et al, 2006). The present study aimed to eliminate some of the confounding factors by using logographic novel writings that vary in their character likeness to study the early electrophysiological responses (N170 and P100) to such writings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial important stage of reading is visual word recognition that occurs within 200 ms. Neurophysiological research has identified two typical reading-related components, P100 and N170 (also known as P1 and N1) at the occipital and occipito-temporal electrodes, which peak at about 100 ms and 170 ms (Bentin, Mouchetant-Rostaing, Giard, Echallier, & Pernier, 1999;Brem et al, 2006;Simon, Bernard, Lalonde, & Rebai, 2006). N170 has been deemed a category-specific component because of its consistent differences in amplitude and lateralization across words, faces, and other objects (Rossion, Joyce, Cottrell, & Tarr, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%