2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10543-019-00775-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orthogonality constrained gradient reconstruction for superconvergent linear functionals

Abstract: The post-processing of the solution of variational problems discretized with Galerkin finite element methods is particularly useful for the computation of quantities of interest. Such quantities are generally expressed as linear functionals of the solution and the error of their approximation is bounded by the error of the solution itself. Several a posteriori recovery procedures have been developed over the years to improve the accuracy of post-processed results. Nonetheless such recovery methods usually dete… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anisotropic plasticity, however, typically precludes the use of radial‐return like algorithms for associative plasticity because the predictor and corrector flow directions (ie, the trial and actual surface normals) are not equivalent due to the yield surface no longer being a hyper‐sphere. Ensuring associative flow, ie, enforcing the normality condition, can be achieved by simultaneously solving for the amount and direction of the plastic flow within the return mapping algorithm, ie, the so‐called closest‐point projection (CPP) type algorithms; however, the additional computational expense of this approach can make it an unrealistic option for large scale computations where efficiency of numerical algorithms is paramount …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anisotropic plasticity, however, typically precludes the use of radial‐return like algorithms for associative plasticity because the predictor and corrector flow directions (ie, the trial and actual surface normals) are not equivalent due to the yield surface no longer being a hyper‐sphere. Ensuring associative flow, ie, enforcing the normality condition, can be achieved by simultaneously solving for the amount and direction of the plastic flow within the return mapping algorithm, ie, the so‐called closest‐point projection (CPP) type algorithms; however, the additional computational expense of this approach can make it an unrealistic option for large scale computations where efficiency of numerical algorithms is paramount …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%