Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11083-007-9075-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orthogonal Surfaces and Their CP-Orders

Abstract: Orthogonal surfaces are nice mathematical objects which have interesting connections to various fields, e.g., integer programming, monomial ideals and order dimension. While orthogonal surfaces in one or two dimensions are rather trivial already the three dimensional case has a rich structure with connections to Schnyder woods, planar graphs and three-polytopes. Our objective is to detect more of the structure of orthogonal surfaces in four and higher dimensions. In particular we are driven by the question whi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Orthogonal structures also open a line for generalizations to higher dimensions. This line of research is the subject of [18]. So far 4 has shown to be more elusive.…”
Section: Order Dimension and Planaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Orthogonal structures also open a line for generalizations to higher dimensions. This line of research is the subject of [18]. So far 4 has shown to be more elusive.…”
Section: Order Dimension and Planaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schnyder woods were introduced by Schnyder in [35] and [36]. They have numerous applications in the context of graph drawing, e.g., [2,6,28], dimension theory for orders, graphs and polytopes, e.g., [35,8,18], enumeration and encoding of planar structures, e.g., [32,21]. The connection with 3-orientations was found by de Fraysseix and Ossona de Mendez [11].…”
Section: Theorem 83 (See De Fraysseix and De Mendezmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, n}. Indeed, Lemma 1 and the fact that it is tight for all point sets that are in general postition and do not lie in a plane containing the all-ones vector can be deduced from a more general theorem of Scarf [14].…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 96%