“…From theorem 3.1 we know that if {a n , b n , c n , d n }, n ∈ N, is a solution of (1) it is equivalent to say that (17) is verified. Starting by (17), to obtain the relation (31) for R J it is sufficient to take derivatives in (5) and to substituteJ by its equivalent condition (17). Reciprocally, if (31) holds, using the fact that R J (z) = M F(z)M −1 and the paragraph (d) of theorem 3.1, we get {a n , b n , c n , d n }, n ∈ N, is a solution of (1).…”