The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-0427(99)00027-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orthogonal Laurent polynomials and strong moment theory: a survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A survey of this and related results is provided by Jones and Njåstad [22]. An extension of the recursion relation discussed by Njåstad and Thron [24] to the sequence of rational Krylov subspaces…”
Section: Introduction Let a ∈ Rmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A survey of this and related results is provided by Jones and Njåstad [22]. An extension of the recursion relation discussed by Njåstad and Thron [24] to the sequence of rational Krylov subspaces…”
Section: Introduction Let a ∈ Rmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A classical approach to rational Gauss quadrature rules for f ∈ L 2m−2,2m+1 that does not explicitly utilize the recursion matrix H 2m is found in [22], where they are referred to as "strong Gaussian quadrature rules". This section demonstrates that more general rational Gauss rules exist for f ∈ L 2m−2,2mi+1 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this theorem one of the most commonly used orderings in the literature on orthogonal L-polynomials appears (see, e.g., [20]). …”
Section: Orthogonal Laurent Polynomials Associated With a Certain Strmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such distributions were earlier introduced in 1980 by Jones et al in their celebrated paper A Strong Stieltjes Moment Problem [17]. After this, the theory of the so-called orthogonal Laurent polynomials made their appearance [18] (see also [22,16,5]) and connections were established with certain kinds of continued fractions, two-point Padé approximants and new quadrature rules (see [20] for a survey). On the other hand, both orthogonal Laurent polynomials and proper orthogonal polynomials can be considered as particular cases within a more general framework: orthogonal rational functions with prescribed poles [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a fact [10,11,15,17] (on R) with the given (real) moments. For the case of the SSMP, there are four (Hankel determinant) inequalities (in this latter case, the c k , k ∈ Z, which appear in Equations (1.1) should be replaced by c SSMP k , k ∈ Z) which guarantee the existence of a non-negative measure µ SS MP (on [0, +∞)) with the given moments, namely [8] (see, also, [10,11] The φ n 's are normalised so that they all have real coefficients; in particular, the leading coefficients, LC(φ 2n ) := ξ [12,17]; see, also, [25]): φ 2m (ζ)(zφ 2m−1 (z)−ζφ 2m−1 (ζ))−ζφ 2m−1 (ζ)(φ 2m (z)−φ 2m (ζ)) = (z−ζ) ξ moreover, it can be shown that (see, for example, [15,17]), for n ∈ Z For each m ∈ Z + 0 , let µ 2m := card{z; π π π 2m (z) = 0} and µ 2m+1 := card{z; π π π 2m+1 (z) = 0}.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%