2020
DOI: 10.1029/2019gl086888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orthogonal Fault Rupture and Rapid Postseismic Deformation Following 2019 Ridgecrest, California, Earthquake Sequence Revealed From Geodetic Observations

Abstract: We studied the 2019 Mw6.4 and Mw7.1 Ridgecrest, California, earthquake sequence, using Sentinel‐1 and ALOS‐2 coseismic interferograms and subpixel offsets to retrieve the three‐dimensional (3‐D) surface displacements. By inverting the 3‐D displacements, optimal dip angles of the earthquake faults and the slip model were obtained. The interferometric synthetic aperture radar‐based slip model supplemented with the analysis of GPS data shows that the Mw6.4 event ruptured two orthogonal faults and its major geodet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
37
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
9
37
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The Camp 263 fault is almost conjugate to the main nearly EW‐striking fault rupture. A similar rupture pattern was proposed for the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence, in which two orthogonal faults were ruptured sequentially (Barnhart et al, 2019; Feng et al, 2020). Coseismic slip on the Camp 263 fault can be explained either as slip on a secondary fault plane adjacent to the main fault or as the possible shallow rupture of an aftershock.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The Camp 263 fault is almost conjugate to the main nearly EW‐striking fault rupture. A similar rupture pattern was proposed for the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence, in which two orthogonal faults were ruptured sequentially (Barnhart et al, 2019; Feng et al, 2020). Coseismic slip on the Camp 263 fault can be explained either as slip on a secondary fault plane adjacent to the main fault or as the possible shallow rupture of an aftershock.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The different magnitude of stress rotation over different regions could be related to the spatial heterogeneities in stress and stress drop, as the mainshock coseismic slip is not uniform in space. However, the stress rotation is surprisingly small for Region B, where the largest coseismic slip of M w 7.1 event occurred (Barnhart et al, 2019; Chen et al, 2020; Feng et al, 2020; Goldberg et al, 2020; Ross et al, 2019). Note the stress rotations depend not only on the stress drop ratio but also on the angle between the premainshock stress field and the orientation of fault (Hardebeck & Hauksson, 2001).…”
Section: State Of Stress In the Ridgecrest Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatial distribution of aftershocks of the M w 6.4 event illuminates that it ruptured a conjugated fault system that forming an “L” shape (Ross et al, 2019; Lin, 2020; Liu et al, 2020; Shelly, 2020). The kinematic subevent and finite fault inversions provide additional evidence that the M w 6.4 event ruptured both the NW‐SE and NE‐SW trending faults (Chen et al, 2020; Feng et al, 2020; Jia et al, 2019; Liu et al, 2019; Ross et al, 2019), although only the NE‐SW trending rupture is captured by the InSAR optical image (Barnhart et al, 2019). About 34 hr later, a Mw 7.1 event initialized near the NW end of the aftershock zone of the M w 6.4 event and ruptured bilaterally on a ~50 km NW‐SE striking fault (Barnhart et al, 2019; Chen et al, 2020; Goldberg et al, 2020; Lin, 2020; Liu et al, 2019; Liu et al, 2020; Ross et al, 2019; Shelly, 2020), with clear surface breaks observed by geological surveys and satellite observations (Brandenberg et al, 2019; Fielding et al, 2020; Ross et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presently, studies on the correlation between crustal movement and fault activity have rapidly progressed with the development of satellite-based remote sensing technology, such as GPS [7], InSAR, and gravimetry systems [8,9]. Furthermore, satellites have detected thermal infrared radiation (TIR) anomalies in faulted regions before and after strong earthquakes [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%