1957
DOI: 10.1017/s0305004100032916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orthogonal and oblique projectors and the characteristics of pairs of vector spaces

Abstract: The statistical operation of multiple linear regression by least squares is equivalent to the orthogonal projection of vectors of observations on a space spanned by vectors of observations; and a partial regression can be similarly represented as an oblique projection. This connexion between a statistical and a formal algebraical operation gives the main source of interest for this investigation. Its object is to develop algebraical theory which supplies terms necessary for a unified algebraical and geometrica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
108
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
108
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some early results on oblique projections, which foreshadowed the derivation of (1.1) can be found in [1]; see also [3], [10], [13], [20], [37], [40], [44], for some additional properties of oblique projections not discussed here.…”
Section: Preliminaries Statement Of the Main Theorem And Simple Promentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some early results on oblique projections, which foreshadowed the derivation of (1.1) can be found in [1]; see also [3], [10], [13], [20], [37], [40], [44], for some additional properties of oblique projections not discussed here.…”
Section: Preliminaries Statement Of the Main Theorem And Simple Promentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Property (13) and the following consequence also appear in Reference [7] for real vector spaces. Afriat called the pairs (u i , v i ) reciprocal.…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 11 (Afriat [7,23], Gutmann and Shepp [24]) In any pair of subspaces M 1 and M 2 there exist orthonormal bases…”
Section: From Relation (17) We Immediately Obtainmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Perhaps this is because most instructors feel that such extensions are difficult to understand, or that further effort in this direction is not worthwhile. Indeed, this makes sense for angles between general subspaces because one would have to introduce concepts like gap or distance between subspaces [Kato (1966), Stewart and Sun (1990)], principal (or canonical) angles [Afriat (1957), Björck and Golub (1973), Wedin (1982), Stewart and Sun (1990)], the CS decomposition [Stewart (1977), Davis and Kahan (1970), Stewart (1973), Golub and Van Loan (1989), Stewart and Sun (1990)], and so on. These topics are better off in a more advanced course.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%