Orthognathic surgery: the patients' perspective

Cheng, L.; Roles, D.; Telfer, M.R.

doi:10.1016/s0266-4356(98)90709-4

Cited by 38 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…[18][19][20] A purpose of orthognathic treatment is to achieve a harmonious skeletal, dental, and soft-tissue relationship for the improvement of facial esthetics and function. 21 It is so meaningful to include soft tissue evaluation for the treatment program and the therapeutic prediction. Alterations of the soft tissue profile that accompany mandibular setback surgery have been introduced by several studies.…”

Section: Soft Tissuementioning

confidence: 99%

Hard and Soft Tissue Stability of Orthognathic Surgery

Kitahara

Nakasima

Kurahara

et al. 2009

The Angle Orthodontist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To test the hypothesis that there is no difference in the stability of the hard and soft tissue changes following a surgical mandibular setback using a sagittal split ramus osteotomy or an intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy. Materials and Methods: The samples consisted of 45 female patients with mandibular prognathism, who were divided into two groups. Twenty-three underwent a sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) with rigid fixation by titanium mini-screws and maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) for 14.0 Ϯ 0.7 days. Twenty-two underwent intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) without rigid fixation, and MMF was released 21.5 Ϯ 3.3 days after surgery. Data were collected from standardized cephalometric radiographs taken at the start of preoperative orthodontic treatment (T1), immediately after surgery (MMF, T2), and the completion of postoperative treatment (T3). Angular measurements were compared on each of T1, T2, and T3. Results: There were no significant differences in the pretreatment hard and soft tissue morphology between the SSRO and IVRO. However, when fixation was released, the mandible was posteriorly positioned in the IVRO group. In the soft tissue profile, the mental region was located backward in the IVRO group at postoperative stage (T3). Conclusions:The hypothesis is rejected. The soft tissue profile of the IVRO group especially showed a retromandibular position after postoperative treatment in comparison with the SSRO group. This tendency of the IVRO group would contribute to the database for treatment planning and prediction. (Angle Orthod. 2009;79:158-165.)

show abstract

Section: Soft Tissuementioning

confidence: 99%

Hard and Soft Tissue Stability of Orthognathic Surgery

Kitahara

Nakasima

Kurahara

et al. 2009

The Angle Orthodontist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…23 Dentofasiyal deformiteler için cerrahi müdahale kararları, estetik problemin hastanın farkında olmasına, oklüzal deformitenin …”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Fasiyal Asimetrinin Ortodontik-Cerrahi Tedavisi: Vaka Raporu

Şenışık

Selin

2017

Selcuk Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Eine Übersichtsarbeit von Cheng et al [2] von 1998 machte deutlich, dass sich die allgemein empfundene Zufriedenheit auch bei Kollektiven, die eine geringe kaufunktionelle Verbesserung angaben, zwischen 78 und 100% bewegte. Auch in der vorliegenden Arbeit lag die angegebene Verbesserung der Kaufunktion bei nur 65,8%, jedoch war die allgemeine Patientenzufriedenheit deutlich höher angesiedelt.…”

Section: Diskussionunclassified

Patientenzufriedenheit mit dem Endergebnis eines orthognath-chirurgischen Eingriffs und Einfluss von ästhetischen und funktionellen Kriterien

Maurer

Otto

Bock

et al. 2002

Mund Kiefer GesichtsChir

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The following qualities of sensation were recorded: anesthetic (2.7%), hypesthetic (16.6%), paresthetic (8.3%), and normesthetic (72.4%). The patients' satisfaction was rated as very satisfied in 51.3%, as satisfactory in 44.8%, and in 3.9% the patients' expectations had not been fulfilled; 75% regarded their outward appearance as markedly improved and a good 50% of the patients noted improved mastication. Therefore, three-fourths of all the patients would even be willing to be operated on again. Two-dimensional analysis, however, demonstrated only a weakly significant positive relationship between patient satisfaction and the preserved, or restored, sensation in the trigeminal region.

show abstract

Orthognathic surgery: the patients' perspective

Cited by 38 publications

References 11 publications

Hard and Soft Tissue Stability of Orthognathic Surgery

Hard and Soft Tissue Stability of Orthognathic Surgery

Fasiyal Asimetrinin Ortodontik-Cerrahi Tedavisi: Vaka Raporu

Patientenzufriedenheit mit dem Endergebnis eines orthognath-chirurgischen Eingriffs und Einfluss von ästhetischen und funktionellen Kriterien

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About