Orthodontists’ preference on type of rigid fixed functional appliance for skeletal Class II correction: A survey study

Abstract

Background Rigid fixed functional appliances are most commonly used to correct skeletal Class II malocclusions. The objective of this study was to assess orthodontists’ preference of different rigid fixed functional appliances used in the U.S.A for correction of skeletal Class II malocclusions. Material and Methods A survey on use and preference of rigid fixed functional appliances for skeletal Class II correction was emailed to 2,227 members of the American Association of Orthodontists (AAO) in the U.S.A. Frequency distribution of different responses and their association with demographic factors was assessed. Results Out of 140 orthodontists completing the survey, 110 responded as using rigid fixed functional appliances. Eight incomplete responses were eliminated from data analysis. 51.5% (68/132) orthodontists used rigid fixed functional appliances. The most preferred rigid fixed functional appliance was the Herbst appliance with 72% response followed by Mandibular Anterior Repositioning Appliance (24%) and AdvanSync (4%). There was no statistically significant difference in use of rigid fixed functional appliances between different age groups ( p =0.284). However, the 40-54 age group used the most rigid fixed functional appliances in practice, followed by the 25-39 year age group and the 55-69 age group using these appliances the least. There was statistical significance between the type of practice setting one works in and the use of rigid fixed functional appliances in practice ( p =0.022). Conclusions About 52% of orthodontists use rigid fixed functional appliances to correct skeletal Class II malocclusions. The Herbst appliance is the most commonly used and most preferred amongst all rigid fixed functional appliances with a 72% preferred rate. Key words: Orthodontic, Rigid fixed functional appliance, Skeletal Class II, Class II Malocclusion, Mandibular retrognathism, Herbst, Mandibular Anterior Repositioning Appliance (MARA), AdvanSync, Molar to molar, M2M.

Class II Malocclusion Treatment by In-House Fabricated, Customized Fixed Functional Appliance in Growing Child

“…Rigid, hybrid, and flexible types of fixed functional appliances are all commercially available subcategories. Available literature reported that Rigid fixed functional appliances (FFA) showed the highest promising results in Class II malocclusion among growing patients [ 12 , 13 ]. This report discussed the in-house laboratory fabrication and clinical procedure of customized fixed functional appliance, Falguni Mehta's Mesial Jet (FM2 JET), by utilizing the readily available dental materials in the orthodontic clinical setting.…”

Minimization of Adverse Effects Associated with Dental Alloys

“…According to the experts, by 2026, the proportion of people with dental implants may reach 23% [ 2 ]. Moreover, the use of fixed orthodontic appliances is also predicted to rise, including in the adult category [ 3 ]. The most commonly used metal alloys in dentistry include cobalt-chromium, nickel-titanium, nickel-chromium, and titanium alloys.…”