Orthodontie «invisible»

Pernier, Claire; Diemunsch, Caroline

doi:10.1051/orthodfr/2011110

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 63 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Ainsi, la plupart des auteurs [40,101,108,112] préconisent d'informer objectivement les patients sur les désagréments de la technique linguale concernant notamment l'élocution et la gêne encourue notamment en début de traitement.…”

Section: La Perception Des Patientsunclassified

Les appareils orthodontiques invisibles et presque invisibles

Baron¹

2014

Orthod Fr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

La demande des patients en appareil esthétique non visible est en permanente augmentation. Deux types d’orthodontie permettent d’obtenir un taux d’acceptabilité convenable auprès des patients. La technique linguale a évolué constamment en proposant des attaches pré-fabriquées ou des attaches sur mesure. Les possibilités techniques et les résultats ont été améliorés avec le temps. Les gouttières thermoplastiques sont une alternative aux dispositifs linguaux et sont en plein essor. Leurs propriétés spécifiques permettent de mieux apprécier leurs indications et leurs limites. Une revue de la littérature, l’évolution des systèmes et la présentation de quelques exemples cliniques de cas traités nous permettent de donner des éléments de compréhension de chacun de ces deux types d’appareil et de mettre en évidence les avantages et les inconvénients de chacun d’eux.

show abstract

Section: La Perception Des Patientsunclassified

Les appareils orthodontiques invisibles et presque invisibles

Baron¹

2014

Orthod Fr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In fact, this technique, which offers an anchor on each tooth, allows not only for very precise movement but also for reorientation in all directions. This technique offers optimal performance and versatility compared to other methods (lingual or aligners) with more or less limited applications [1,3,9].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effectiveness and Efficiency of Orthodontic Treatment Using Fixed Appliances Versus Aligners: A Systematic Review

El Mouden,

Zahour

2024

Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To analyze the current literature in order to compare the outcome of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances versus aligners in terms of effectiveness and efficiency. An electronic search was undertaken through PubMed, Cochrane, and ScienceDirect. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. This literature review was carried out according to the PRISMA criteria (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). The risk of bias in included studies was assessed using the Cochrane ROB-2 tool. Ten articles were retained. Some heterogeneity of the results was noted and it remains difficult to come up with clear and consensual clinical recommendations. It seems that the aligners were as effective as a fixed orthodontic treatment on class 1 malocclusions, but, some dental movements remain difficult to control like vertical movements and rotation. Conversely, the aligners are increasingly favored by patients, for esthetic and comfort reasons. This review shows that the future of aligners is very promising. Studies comparing fixed orthodontics and aligners have shown that each has its own specificities. A precise diagnosis, knowledge of biomechanics, and the limits of each means are the conditions required to achieve a result in line with the initial treatment objectives.

show abstract

Orthodontie «invisible»

Cited by 2 publications

References 63 publications

Les appareils orthodontiques invisibles et presque invisibles

Les appareils orthodontiques invisibles et presque invisibles

Effectiveness and Efficiency of Orthodontic Treatment Using Fixed Appliances Versus Aligners: A Systematic Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About