Previous worlc had shown the somewhat unexpected course of nitration, bromination, and dernethylation reactions of rnetaineconine and its derivatives. The discovery that metarneconine could easily be dinitrated enabled us to bring t o light equally interesting results in the relative rates of reduction of the nitro groups, in the course of certain nucleophilic substitution reactions, in the activation of the methylene group, and in certain physical properties. i\/luch of the work, past and present, now holds as its main interest the somewhat special character of a nitro group in the 7-position.Metameconine (I), because its contrasting methylene and carbonyl groups are equivalently situated with respect to a pair of vacant positions and with respect to a pair of methoxyl groups, is beautifully adapted to the study of competing factors in aromatic reactions. RAy and Robinson (1) were the first to employ it in this way; we have followed their example, and the work of this paper, together with our previously reported experimental work, amounts to a qualitative survey of the possibilities of the system.In one of the earliest tests of the new "electronic" theory of reactions, RAy and Robinson (1) predicted that rnetalneconine should undergo nitration a t position 7 (because of the depression of the directing influence of the methoxyl a t position 5 by contributor I1 to the overall structure of metameconine) rather than a t position 4 (suggested by the simple summation of the effects of the separate groups). This predictioil was later verified (1-4). Ingold (5) generalized solnewhat similar situations as characteristic of systems having a +E group Ineta to a -I-iM group; his generalization has been applied to the present series by Blair and Newbold (6). Such systems often show differences between the directions of nitration and bromination, attributed by Ingold (5) to the greater steric requirements of bromination. Metameconine in particular is bromainated a t the 4-position (3), but Ingold's explanation is sufficiently less convincing for it than for the experimental examples cited by him to encourage consideration of other effects. Other differences between nitration and bromination are of course known; their importance is recognized and we hope to investigate them later, but in the absence of more quantitative data, only one is worth mentioning here because of its simplicity and because of its application in the quite different reaction of demethylation. Metameconine is much more likely to have its carbonyl protonated under the conditions of nitration than under those of