1977
DOI: 10.1037/h0077325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orogastric determinants of drinking in rats: Interaction between absorptive and peripheral controls.

Abstract: Water intake of water-deprived rats, drinking with absorption prevented by pyloric occlusion, was compared with that of rats drinking normally. Drinking without absorption, under the control of only orogastric factors, was not graded in response to varied deprivation (Experiment 1). Orogastric controls effectively inhibited intake after absorbed water, but not isotonic saline, preloads (Experiment 2). The extent of orogastric inhibition was directly related to absorbed preload volume (Experiment 3). With large… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, studies examining water intake while the ingested fluid is confined to the stomach argue against gastric distention as an inhibitory signal for water consumption. That is, water deprived rats consume more water when the ingested fluid is confined to the stomach by a pyloric cuff than when it is allowed to enter the duodenum, suggesting that the distention that occurs as a consequence of gastric filling does not contribute to the satiation of deprivation-induced water intake (4, 12, 13). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, studies examining water intake while the ingested fluid is confined to the stomach argue against gastric distention as an inhibitory signal for water consumption. That is, water deprived rats consume more water when the ingested fluid is confined to the stomach by a pyloric cuff than when it is allowed to enter the duodenum, suggesting that the distention that occurs as a consequence of gastric filling does not contribute to the satiation of deprivation-induced water intake (4, 12, 13). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rats were the experimental subject in many of those earlier studies, most of which focused on the roles of gastric distension and systemic hydration in inhibiting water ingestion by dehydrated rats (6). For example, observations that water consumption increased when a closed pyloric cuff precluded gastric emptying (9,15) suggested that drinking was inhibited under normal conditions by gastric distension together with a signal related to the low osmolality or Na ϩ concentration of the fluid that entered the small intestine (4,19). But why do dehydrated rats stop drinking 0.15 M NaCl, when osmotic dilution cannot be a factor?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the next 16 days the bottle contained a NaCl solution. Specifically, each rat was given 0.05 M NaCl solution to drink on days 5-8, 0.10 M NaCl solution on days 9 -12, 0.15 M NaCl solution on days [13][14][15][16], and 0.20 M NaCl solution on days [17][18][19][20]. At the end of the 1-h sessions, food was returned to the cages, and the drinking fluid remained available until 5:00 PM, when the deprivation period began again.…”
Section: Experimental Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, to serve as an indication of the effectiveness of hypertonic saline preloads on cellular thirst, hypertonic, isotonic, and sham preloads were given to rats maintained on a water-deprivation schedule. Water-deprivation-induced drinking is thought to be primarily under the control of cellular thirst mechanisms (Hall & Blass, 1977). This allowed for a comparison of the effectiveness of hypertonic saline preloads on schedule-induced polydipsia with the effects of hypertonic saline preloads on a form of drinking known to be primarily under the influence of cellular controls, that is, water-deprivation-induced drinking.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%