Orofaziale Spaltbildungen

Reiter, Rudolf; Haase, S.; Brosch, S.

doi:10.1055/s-0031-1285886

Cited by 10 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 13 publications

(15 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Orofaziale Spaltbildungen zählen zu den am weitesten verbreiteten Fehlbildungen insgesamt und entstehen aus fehlerhaften Verschmelzungsprozessen des Gesichts während der Embryogenese [17][18][19]. Es sind die häufigsten Fehlbildungen des Kopf-und Halsbereiches [20,21].…”

Section: Hintergrundunclassified

“…Es sind die häufigsten Fehlbildungen des Kopf-und Halsbereiches [20,21]. Die Prävalenz liegt bei 9,92-14,29/10 000 Geborene [18,22]. Zu den Risikofaktoren zählen unter anderem wieder ein Folsäuremangel während der Schwangerschaft, genetische Disposition, das Alter der Mutter ( > 40 Jahre), die Einnahme von Vitamin A oder Antikonvulsiva während der Schwangerschaft [19,20].…”

Section: Hintergrundunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Prävalenz von Gastroschisis, Omphalozele, Spina bifida und orofazialen Spaltbildungen bei Neugeborenen im Zeitraum Januar 2000–Dezember 2010 in Leipzig, Sachsen, Sachsen-Anhalt und Deutschland

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Whether or not there has been an actual increase in the prevalence of neonatal malformations in Germany over the years or the apparent increase is just due to bias, coding errors, multiple reporting and/or false registration and codification remains unclear. Importantly, in Germany, since prevalence of malformations is monitored prospectively only in Saxony-Anhalt and Rhineland-Palatinate, only in these states is it possible to recognize recent changes. For early identification of changes in prevalence and timely implementation of preventive measures, a nationwide register or additional regional registers are deemed necessary.

show abstract

Section: Hintergrundunclassified

Prävalenz von Gastroschisis, Omphalozele, Spina bifida und orofazialen Spaltbildungen bei Neugeborenen im Zeitraum Januar 2000–Dezember 2010 in Leipzig, Sachsen, Sachsen-Anhalt und Deutschland

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The method is applied in patients with congenital malformations, e.g. cleft palate [20]. Furthermore, it is used in situations after surgical interventions with or without ensuing defects, e.g.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Selected Speech Parameters after Prosthesis Supply in Patients with Maxillary or Mandibular Defects

Müller¹,

Höhlein

Wolf

et al. 2013

Oncol Res Treat

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Ablative surgery of oropharyngeal tumors frequently leads to defects in the speech organs, resulting in impairment of speech up to the point of unintelligibility. The aim of the present study was the assessment of selected parameters of speech with and without resection prostheses. Patients and Methods: The speech sounds of 22 patients suffering from maxillary and mandibular defects were recorded using a digital audio tape (DAT) recorder with and without resection prostheses. Evaluation of the resonance and the production of the sounds /s/, /sch/, and /ch/ was performed by 2 experienced speech therapists. Additionally, the patients completed a non-standardized questionnaire containing a linguistic self-assessment. Results: After prosthesis supply, the number of patients with rhinophonia aperta decreased from 7 to 2 while the number of patients with intelligible speech increased from 2 to 20. Correct production of the sounds /s/, /sch/, and /ch/ increased from 2 to 13 patients. A significant improvement of the evaluated parameters could be observed only in patients with maxillary defects. The linguistic self-assessment showed a higher satisfaction in patients with maxillary defects. Conclusion: In patients with maxillary defects due to ablative tumor surgery, an increase in speech performance and intelligibility is possible by supplying resection prostheses.

show abstract

“…Non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate or isolated cleft palate display a partial separation of the oral cavity and the nasal space without any extra malformations. Beside complete cleft palate also sub-mucous cleft palates occur that are concealed underneath the intact mucosa [4]. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has estimated that, each year in the United States, about 2,650 babies are born with a cleft palate and 4,440 babies are born with a cleft lip with or without a cleft palate [5].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The etiology of clefts is a multifarious interaction between environmental and genetic factors [4]. Based on epidemiological and embryological data, cleft lip and/or palate and cleft palate are considered distinct forms of orofacial clefting [9].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prevalence and Incidence of Orofacial Cleft Anomalies in Children with Cleft Lip and Palate Associated with Etiological Deformities in Hail Region, Saudi Arabia

Faraj AlShammari,

Habib AlShammary,

Rasheed Alshubrmi

et al. 2017

IJDSR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: The aim of this study was to explore the prevalence, incidence and possible etiological risk factors of orofacial cleft in Hail Region, Northern Saudi Arabia. Methodology: This is a retrospective study conducted in Maternity Hospital, Hail, Saudi Arabia. Data of seven years (2011-2017) records of newborn infants were reviewed for the presence of orofacial anomalies (included 27800 files). Results: The overall prevalence rate of orofacial cleft was 1.08 per 1000 births. Out of 30 patients diagnosed with orofacial anomalies, 14(46.7%) were found with cleft palate, 11(36.7%) with bilateral cleft lip and palate, 4(13.3%) with bilateral cleft lip and only one (3.3%) with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Conclusion: The prevalence of orofacial clefts in Northern Saudi Arabia was similar or slightly lower than the higher global reported rates. Cleft palate was the most common type of orofacial cleft in Northern Saudi Arabia.

show abstract

Orofaziale Spaltbildungen

Cited by 10 publications

References 13 publications

Prävalenz von Gastroschisis, Omphalozele, Spina bifida und orofazialen Spaltbildungen bei Neugeborenen im Zeitraum Januar 2000–Dezember 2010 in Leipzig, Sachsen, Sachsen-Anhalt und Deutschland

Prävalenz von Gastroschisis, Omphalozele, Spina bifida und orofazialen Spaltbildungen bei Neugeborenen im Zeitraum Januar 2000–Dezember 2010 in Leipzig, Sachsen, Sachsen-Anhalt und Deutschland

Evaluation of Selected Speech Parameters after Prosthesis Supply in Patients with Maxillary or Mandibular Defects

Prevalence and Incidence of Orofacial Cleft Anomalies in Children with Cleft Lip and Palate Associated with Etiological Deformities in Hail Region, Saudi Arabia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About